Actually, Fat Hurts. I did watch a little of the hearings. But why would I watch more? If the hearings were fair and bi-partisan, then sure I would be watching. But the Dems did the same crap they do for everything. They only select the radicals from their party. Here they added 2 anti-Trumpers. Hillary's health insurance task force. Behind closed doors and all uber-liberals. Mueller was indeed selected by the republican Rod R. but evveryone Mueller selected was a far-left Dem. Impeachment more of the same - not one republican and all far-left Dems. Impeachment 2 - more of the same. Pelosi et al. don't want fair hearings. Of course not - they want to slam their agenda down everyone's throats. So, yes, Fat H - I watched a little but not too much. Just another witch hunt by the radical leftists who dominate the Dem party these days.
Actually, Fat Hurts. I did watch a little of the hearings. But why would I watch more? If the hearings were fair and bi-partisan, then sure I would be watching. But the Dems did the same crap they do for everything. They only select the radicals from their party. Here they added 2 anti-Trumpers. Hillary's health insurance task force. Behind closed doors and all uber-liberals. Mueller was indeed selected by the republican Rod R. but evveryone Mueller selected was a far-left Dem. Impeachment more of the same - not one republican and all far-left Dems. Impeachment 2 - more of the same. Pelosi et al. don't want fair hearings. Of course not - they want to slam their agenda down everyone's throats. So, yes, Fat H - I watched a little but not too much. Just another witch hunt by the radical leftists who dominate the Dem party these days.
And Obamacare had not one Republican help craft it. The Dems are certainly not the party of unity and working together.
Actually, Fat Hurts. I did watch a little of the hearings. But why would I watch more? If the hearings were fair and bi-partisan, then sure I would be watching. But the Dems did the same crap they do for everything. They only select the radicals from their party. Here they added 2 anti-Trumpers. Hillary's health insurance task force. Behind closed doors and all uber-liberals. Mueller was indeed selected by the republican Rod R. but evveryone Mueller selected was a far-left Dem. Impeachment more of the same - not one republican and all far-left Dems. Impeachment 2 - more of the same. Pelosi et al. don't want fair hearings. Of course not - they want to slam their agenda down everyone's throats. So, yes, Fat H - I watched a little but not too much. Just another witch hunt by the radical leftists who dominate the Dem party these days.
And Obamacare had not one Republican help craft it. The Dems are certainly not the party of unity and working together.
sally some day you will come to the conclusion that lying all day on LRC is not a good way to spend your life. You will find that if became willing to learn you would be such a better informed person. Instead you just make the same false claims time after time...it's a free country but come on. Try.
For probably the 100th time, Rs had lots of input on the ACA.
Actually, Fat Hurts. I did watch a little of the hearings. But why would I watch more? If the hearings were fair and bi-partisan, then sure I would be watching. But the Dems did the same crap they do for everything. They only select the radicals from their party. Here they added 2 anti-Trumpers. Hillary's health insurance task force. Behind closed doors and all uber-liberals. Mueller was indeed selected by the republican Rod R. but evveryone Mueller selected was a far-left Dem. Impeachment more of the same - not one republican and all far-left Dems. Impeachment 2 - more of the same. Pelosi et al. don't want fair hearings. Of course not - they want to slam their agenda down everyone's throats. So, yes, Fat H - I watched a little but not too much. Just another witch hunt by the radical leftists who dominate the Dem party these days.
And Obamacare had not one Republican help craft it. The Dems are certainly not the party of unity and working together.
Obamacare was written by a conservative think tank
And Obamacare had not one Republican help craft it. The Dems are certainly not the party of unity and working together.
sally some day you will come to the conclusion that lying all day on LRC is not a good way to spend your life. You will find that if became willing to learn you would be such a better informed person. Instead you just make the same false claims time after time...it's a free country but come on. Try.
For probably the 100th time, Rs had lots of input on the ACA.
sally some day you will come to the conclusion that lying all day on LRC is not a good way to spend your life. You will find that if became willing to learn you would be such a better informed person. Instead you just make the same false claims time after time...it's a free country but come on. Try.
For probably the 100th time, Rs had lots of input on the ACA.
Which of their amdendments were accepted?
I'm not playing your game here. We've gone through this before and if we spent an hour going through the facts again....in a month or two you'd just go back to 'forgetting' all the details.
Toast. (Jennifer Rubin) — It is “sad,” says MIT professor Jonathan Gruber, that presidential candidate Mitt Romney is running away from his Massachusetts [...]
The times they are a-changin’. While the mainstream media went wall-to-wall throughout the weekend with breathless coverage of protests over the Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday overturning Roe v. Wade, a new report says more...
Democrats have no idea the overwhelming majority of the country isn't with them on anything.
Stupid people, people who vote Democrat blindly out of habit, and the people who benefit financially from big government are the only people still voting Democrat.
I'm not playing your game here. We've gone through this before and if we spent an hour going through the facts again....in a month or two you'd just go back to 'forgetting' all the details.
You said Rs had a bunch of "input" in to Obamacare but won't say specifically what that was. So obviously they had none and that is lip service that the Dems to deflect from how partisan it was. So we agree to drop this and neve discuss again. Done.
Am I the only one that finds it amusing that this is supposed to be a thread about Biden, and it seems like most of the posts are about Trump or Musk. C'mon Democrats. Use this thread to extol all of the accomplishments of the Biden Administration thus far. We are waiting.
The number one accomplishment of the Biden administration is that the rampant corruption is gone and we are back to normal.
"Normal" wasn't that great in the first place, but it's a lot better than open grift and corruption.
Actually, Fat Hurts. I did watch a little of the hearings. But why would I watch more? If the hearings were fair and bi-partisan, then sure I would be watching. But the Dems did the same crap they do for everything. They only select the radicals from their party. Here they added 2 anti-Trumpers. Hillary's health insurance task force. Behind closed doors and all uber-liberals. Mueller was indeed selected by the republican Rod R. but evveryone Mueller selected was a far-left Dem. Impeachment more of the same - not one republican and all far-left Dems. Impeachment 2 - more of the same. Pelosi et al. don't want fair hearings. Of course not - they want to slam their agenda down everyone's throats. So, yes, Fat H - I watched a little but not too much. Just another witch hunt by the radical leftists who dominate the Dem party these days.
Be honest. How much did you watch?
Which part did you watch and what did you think of that part specifically?
Musk said it. I said it. He and I are both right. 👍👍👍👍
You are lying. Everyone knows you are lying. If it was true you would post it. You can not point us to a quote where Musk said Tesla will not be an automaker in 20 years (or in 21 years).
I said it. Musk said it. We are right. 👍👍👍👍 I know you found the quote when your posts changed. Post it. I will not let you off the hook. 😂😂😂😂
You are lying. Everyone knows you are lying. If it was true you would post it. You can not point us to a quote where Musk said Tesla will not be an automaker in 20 years (or in 21 years).
I said it. Musk said it. We are right. 👍👍👍👍 I know you found the quote when your posts changed. Post it. I will not let you off the hook. 😂😂😂😂
It would be impossible for me to find a quote that doesn't exist.
You are lying. Everyone knows you are lying. If it was true you would just post the quote.
You can not point us to a quote where Musk said Tesla will not be an automaker in 20 years (or in 21 years).
I'm not playing your game here. We've gone through this before and if we spent an hour going through the facts again....in a month or two you'd just go back to 'forgetting' all the details.
Sally is pure, 100% troll. Her pattern is way too obvious by now for anyone to still think she is anything but.
1) Make ridiculous claim (even one that has gone through the cycle many times before) 2) Have claim proven wrong unequivocally 3) Repeat ridiculous claim 4) Have folks point out that claim was clearly proven to be incorrect 5) Repeat ridiculous claim - now daring anyone to prove them wrong 6) Have folks point out that they are tired of proving this claim wrong 7) Repeat ridiculous claim. Compound it by claiming that no "lib" is able to even address it 8) Have someone shout out, "LOOK AT THE F'ING PROOF THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN SHOWN TO YOU EIGHT TIMES, YOU MORON!!!" 9) Reply that poster is being rude and that only "libs" are rude 10) Have some "saint" on here very politely point out that the claim is pure BS, completely made up by Breitbart & Co. 11) Thank saint for "finally" providing the answer. Give kudos (saint now reverts back to "Maybe Sally isn't a troll. Maybe she is just a lost soul.") 12) Make new ridiculous claim 13) Have new claim proven wrong unequivocally 14) Repeat new ridiculous claim . . . And so on, ad infinitum
Sorry, but this is classic trolling. And there is no way that it is anything other than trolling.
It's interesting that Clarence Thomas says Supreme Court decisions on gay marriage should be revisited.
If there is no right to marry whoever you please then they should also revisit the right to interracial marriage. Do you think Justice Thomas would have a problem with that?