CNBC's Scott Wapner sits down with Steve Wozniak, who co-founded Apple, to discuss why he is losing faith in Tesla.» Subscribe to CNBC: http://cnb.cx/Subscri...
Again, Lauren Boebert was there. She was at the bowling alley when her future husband pulled down his drawers to show the bowlers his genitals. And why a bowling alley? Like some kind of symbolic gesture because of all the balls rolling around? That's the association that this Boebert-husband guy's mind came up with?
So yes, I'd say this exposure/flashing incident does reflect on her ability to make good decisions. Do you know anyone else in Congress who has married a convicted sex flasher?
This deviant behavior never stops once these subtypes of people get going. Very high recidivism rates. Only J. Christ knows how many bowling alleys and putt-putt golf courses that Boebert's husband has dropped his pants at since.
And this is why I didn't want to get into this conversation with you: instead of engaging with what I say, you just rant about Boebert. Congrats. Hope you feel better getting that off your chest. Maybe now you can move on without dragging me into a conversation I have no desire to be a part of.
Well, maybe you need to learn to quit sticking your beak into conversations you know nothing about, before you symbolically throw your hands up in frustration. That's called passive-aggressive behavior.
Tesla will be this generation's Blockbuster Video.
Like Hambo, you have no basis for that opinion.
Blockbuster was disrupted by new technology.
Right now Tesla is the one doing the disrupting.
Legacy autos are the ones in big trouble.
Unless there is another bailout or new EV tax breaks, GM and Ford will be bankrupt within five years. Sooner if the economy gets worse. Their balance sheets looks terrible and they are set to borrow billions to catch up to Tesla. It won't be pretty.
And this is why I didn't want to get into this conversation with you: instead of engaging with what I say, you just rant about Boebert. Congrats. Hope you feel better getting that off your chest. Maybe now you can move on without dragging me into a conversation I have no desire to be a part of.
Well, maybe you need to learn to quit sticking your beak into conversations you know nothing about, before you symbolically throw your hands up in frustration. That's called passive-aggressive behavior.
What are you talking about?
Recap:
I responded to a post that addressed two different discussions. I specifically said I was going to skip the other conversation and talk about the one I thought was worth discussing.
In response, you said that "skipping is the same as condoning".
I pointed out how that is not true, skipping a conversation is NOT condoning. Then, since you seemed so needing of my opinion to have brought that up, I reluctantly gave my opinion on the topic I didn't want to bother discussing.
You then respond to my post talking about NOTHING that I said and rather ranting more on the subject I didn't want to bother discussing in the first place.
And now you're wanting to lecture me about "sticking my beak into conversations you know nothing about, before you symbolically throw your hands up in frustration"?? It's not passive-aggressive behavior to TRY AND AVOID A CONVERSATION THAT YOU DON'T DEEM TO BE WORTH HAVING, and then when you're being dragged into the conversation pointing out that the person who is dragging you into the conversation isn't bothering to even address what little you bothered to say on the topic and just continued to rant about what they wanted to rant about.
I'll say it again: if you want to rant about something, that's fine, but you don't need to include me in on it. Hope you feel better now that you've gotten that off your chest, but next time don't try to needlessly drag me into it especially if you're not going to engage with what I say. Stop trolling and just rant if that's what you really want to do, the rest of us can just leave you to it in peace.
Brother, we’ve through this before. Do you really want to do it again? As I recall, it didn’t end well for you last time. 😂😂😂😂😂
I know some adults (really only one) who love sh1t sandwiches. 💩😂💩🥪😂😂😂😂😂😂
Oh, please tell me why you think Tesla will not make cars in 20 years. I'm ready to be dazzled by your poop-filled brilliance.
Toyota and Subaru working together (Toyota owns 20% of Subaru) to produce some vehicles - I think the first might be a SUV and it looks very promising. Starting around $43,000 it is something I would be interested in. I have never liked the Tesla styling but to each his or her own.
Oh, please tell me why you think Tesla will not make cars in 20 years. I'm ready to be dazzled by your poop-filled brilliance.
Toyota and Subaru working together (Toyota owns 20% of Subaru) to produce some vehicles - I think the first might be a SUV and it looks very promising. Starting around $43,000 it is something I would be interested in. I have never liked the Tesla styling but to each his or her own.
Toyota will probably survive because they are so big. But they are getting a very, very late start when it comes to EVs. They made the mistake of betting on hydrogen.
What is happening right now with Toyota and all the legacy automakers is that they are announcing new EVs with competitive prices but they are unable to make them in volume, so most people who want one can't get one.
Tesla is the only company that makes EVs in high volume and thus, they are the only ones who can do so at a profit. Toyota will lose money on their EVs for many years to come.
But Tesla won't own 100% of the auto market. You are correct that different tastes in styling is one reason why.
Toyota and Subaru working together (Toyota owns 20% of Subaru) to produce some vehicles - I think the first might be a SUV and it looks very promising. Starting around $43,000 it is something I would be interested in. I have never liked the Tesla styling but to each his or her own.
Toyota will probably survive because they are so big. But they are getting a very, very late start when it comes to EVs. They made the mistake of betting on hydrogen.
What is happening right now with Toyota and all the legacy automakers is that they are announcing new EVs with competitive prices but they are unable to make them in volume, so most people who want one can't get one.
Tesla is the only company that makes EVs in high volume and thus, they are the only ones who can do so at a profit. Toyota will lose money on their EVs for many years to come.
But Tesla won't own 100% of the auto market. You are correct that different tastes in styling is one reason why.
Fat Hurts - what first drew you to the Chevy Bolt? Styling-wise, I would not call it a winner and we now know you can't park it anywhere near your house because there is a good chance that it will explode or catch on fire. The car itself is kind of ugly. Why would you buy the Bolt?
