so you're saying that zero women are not fine with it, because the woman you mentioned does not exist. if she did exist, i would be interested in hearing from her. it's unfortunate that the 21st best runner can't be on a 20-man roster team, but that's just how the world works.
funny, because i've noticed the opposite to be true. name one athlete that has spoken out and been threatened and harassed for saying june eastwood shouldn't compete. just to be fair, here, i'll show you one person that has been harassed, including being doxxed from her facebook, for *supporting* cece telfer (scroll to the bottom where Chloe Vieira's tweet is):
https://turtleboysports.com/ginger-beta-male-franklin-pierce-coach-tries-to-get-rival-coach-fired-for-pointing-out-that-a-male-athlete-winning-a-womens-national-championships-isnt-fair/can you please point me to any article which doxxes and harasses someone who opposes trans competition out in the open like this? because i only seem to see them coming from one side of the argument and it's not the side you claim it to be.
"athletes are told they must not complain or they'll be benched or removed from the team" that is a total falsehood without any evidence to support it. despite what some political hacks might say nowadays, free speech is vitally important and decent human beings recognize that, even if your opinion isn't well-informed.
yes there is, there's estrogen. those two chemicals are the only thing that matters in the context of distance running, and both can be changed and checked with medication. all the other factors that you didn't mention don't have any meaningful effect on distance running, or if anything i think they make bio women faster than bio men (like for bone density). it's the testosterone and estrogen that make the only athletic difference with distance running, it's very simple.