surferboy wrote:
1. The law in several areas gives the DoE (therefore Biden) the authority to suspend or forgive loan repayment by individuals.
2. The Founders did not anticipate that Congress would lend out a substantial fraction of the nations wealth (about 2 trillion) to a segment of the voting population.
3. Constitution gives the power of appropriation to Congress not the President.
4. Lending and then forgiving has been made into a two step process that circumvents the Congress.
5. Biden takes this to new heights (or depths), daring the Supreme Court to invalidate his actions. The court did that with his first massive forgiveness program. But will they do that when he his doing the same thing with a large number of small forgivenesses? In the world of money laundering they would call it "smurfing".
you're apparently unfamiliar with "delegation." congress cannot sit there and make and service and forgive loans. they have other things to do. they empower the president to handle the job. the question is, did the president act within what congress said he could do. YOU ADMIT THAT MUCH ITEM ONE. qed. waste of time.
i mean, isn't this the discussion on immigration right now? your stunt impeachment of mayorkas? the notion that biden, mayorkas, and co. still have to basically follow immigration law?
it's not an authority question, or if it is one, it's he does have authority but is precisely what he is doing within that power. on student loans, in literal terms, yes, he does.
last point, i know conservatives are obsessed of late with pushing congressional power but the branches are co-equal, the executive and judiciary are not the legislature's little child, particularly on stuff explicitly given to the executive.