It’s not a mistake. Classic (like stereotypical and original) is not identical to classical in the classical or neo-classical ideology of this political sect. Why I have such a hard time with this is because neither you nor Harambe advocate social Darwinism or have sufficient respect for individual autonomy and free agency. Harambe can argue otherwise until he’s blue in the face, but “mandates” were top down and set at the Federal, State, and Municipal levels. He is not a libertarian or a classical liberal. He’s neither. He’s a typical liberal masquerading as a libertarian. Conservatives do this too.
Whatever dude, you’re never going to convince me about anything. Youre never going to convince me that we have sufficient data. You’re never going to convince me that I or my brethren should’ve been vaccinated. Ever. It’s simply not true. I don’t know why you waste your time, especially if you really are an 86-year old dude with so little of it left. And you’ve made a mockery of public health because nobody is going to listen when we have a true pandemic.
"Classical liberal" has a well accepted meaning my social circles. It's fine if you think it's something different but it's clear that Harambe and I and most people see it the same way.
What's the point here bro? You made a mistake, move on.
It’s not a mistake. Classic (like stereotypical and original) is not identical to classical in the classical or neo-classical ideology of this political sect. Why I have such a hard time with this is because neither you nor Harambe advocate social Darwinism or have sufficient respect for individual autonomy and free agency. Harambe can argue otherwise until he’s blue in the face, but “mandates” were top down and set at the Federal, State, and Municipal levels. He is not a libertarian or a classical liberal. He’s neither. He’s a typical liberal masquerading as a libertarian. Conservatives do this too.
Whatever dude, you’re never going to convince me about anything. Youre never going to convince me that we have sufficient data. You’re never going to convince me that I or my brethren should’ve been vaccinated. Ever. It’s simply not true. I don’t know why you waste your time, especially if you really are an 86-year old dude with so little of it left. And you’ve made a mockery of public health because nobody is going to listen when we have a true pandemic.
Social darwinism? Is this 1885 or something? This is getting borderline incoherent but ok:
Mandates for private citizens were almost exclusively set by employers. That's a fact. You want big government to come in and tell corporations how to operate. That's authoritarianism. I am the voice of small government reason.
I understand we will never convince you. You have repeatedly demonstrated that you are unwilling and unable to evaluate quantitative evidence. You argue exclusively in small anecdotes and appeals to emotion.
Bro, that's gotta be the saddest attempt at hiding your ignorance I've seen. It's ok to not know words.
I suppose I said libertarian and not 'I believe in libertarian-ism' – are those also different things? Good lord.
And incorrect, I knew we would get here. I recommend you read 2600 bro's wiki link (actually read it this time, to avoid gaffes like the above) and then google 'non-aggression principle'
Bro, keep waffling… you are not even remotely close to a libertarian. You know it, I know it, and you know I know it.
It’s obvious libertarian doesn’t mean what he thinks it means. 😂
Harambro hasn’t lost his ability to make a fool of himself during his break. 👍
It’s not a mistake. Classic (like stereotypical and original) is not identical to classical in the classical or neo-classical ideology of this political sect. Why I have such a hard time with this is because neither you nor Harambe advocate social Darwinism or have sufficient respect for individual autonomy and free agency. Harambe can argue otherwise until he’s blue in the face, but “mandates” were top down and set at the Federal, State, and Municipal levels. He is not a libertarian or a classical liberal. He’s neither. He’s a typical liberal masquerading as a libertarian. Conservatives do this too.
Whatever dude, you’re never going to convince me about anything. Youre never going to convince me that we have sufficient data. You’re never going to convince me that I or my brethren should’ve been vaccinated. Ever. It’s simply not true. I don’t know why you waste your time, especially if you really are an 86-year old dude with so little of it left. And you’ve made a mockery of public health because nobody is going to listen when we have a true pandemic.
Social darwinism? Is this 1885 or something? This is getting borderline incoherent but ok:
Mandates for private citizens were almost exclusively set by employers. That's a fact. You want big government to come in and tell corporations how to operate. That's authoritarianism. I am the voice of small government reason.
I understand we will never convince you. You have repeatedly demonstrated that you are unwilling and unable to evaluate quantitative evidence. You argue exclusively in small anecdotes and appeals to emotion.
Nope. Mandates and lockdowns and vaccine passports were pseudo-codified at the bureaucratically constipated levels of Federal and state government. Corporations that wanted to and needed to drink at the trough of the Fed’s monetary spigot (you know, to “resurrect” the economy) had a series of incentives and disincentives. So they chose accordingly.
Being the classical liberal that you are, I’m sure you were just fine with the Federal rescue/stimulatory programs and the Federal Reserve’s persistent monetizing of the debt, which we are still dealing with. 120% debt to GDP is not a good look. But just fine with a libertarian right?
Bull$hit guy if there ever was one, but we all know this. To go along with condescending narcissist. Oh, Djokovic won in straight sets again. How is this dude suffering so visibly from long Covid-associated fatigue and automatic dysfunction wiping the floor with these 20-something, world ranked players not far removed from knee surgery? Makes him even more of a legend, does it not?
It’s not a mistake. Classic (like stereotypical and original) is not identical to classical in the classical or neo-classical ideology of this political sect. Why I have such a hard time with this is because neither you nor Harambe advocate social Darwinism or have sufficient respect for individual autonomy and free agency. Harambe can argue otherwise until he’s blue in the face, but “mandates” were top down and set at the Federal, State, and Municipal levels. He is not a libertarian or a classical liberal. He’s neither. He’s a typical liberal masquerading as a libertarian. Conservatives do this too.
Whatever dude, you’re never going to convince me about anything. Youre never going to convince me that we have sufficient data. You’re never going to convince me that I or my brethren should’ve been vaccinated. Ever. It’s simply not true. I don’t know why you waste your time, especially if you really are an 86-year old dude with so little of it left. And you’ve made a mockery of public health because nobody is going to listen when we have a true pandemic.
Social darwinism? Is this 1885 or something? This is getting borderline incoherent but ok:
Mandates for private citizens were almost exclusively set by employers. That's a fact. You want big government to come in and tell corporations how to operate. That's authoritarianism. I am the voice of small government reason.
I understand we will never convince you. You have repeatedly demonstrated that you are unwilling and unable to evaluate quantitative evidence. You argue exclusively in small anecdotes and appeals to emotion.
Nope. Mandates and lockdowns and vaccine passports were pseudo-codified at the bureaucratically constipated levels of Federal and state government. Corporations that wanted to and needed to drink at the trough of the Fed’s monetary spigot (you know, to “resurrect” the economy) had a series of incentives and disincentives. So they chose accordingly.
Being the classical liberal that you are, I’m sure you were just fine with the Federal rescue/stimulatory programs and the Federal Reserve’s persistent monetizing of the debt, which we are still dealing with. 120% debt to GDP is not a good look. But just fine with a libertarian right?
Bull$hit guy if there ever was one, but we all know this. To go along with condescending narcissist. Oh, Djokovic won in straight sets again. How is this dude suffering so visibly from long Covid-associated fatigue and automatic dysfunction wiping the floor with these 20-something, world ranked players not far removed from knee surgery? Makes him even more of a legend, does it not?
Autonomic dysfunction…
Man, he had to overcome Crohns too… what a legend.
