When that changes I'll stop calling right wingers trumpists.
But not until then.
Hey, it's not like there aren't GOP primaries going on all over the country right now FURTHER proving (as if any more proof were necessary) that Trump might STILL be a BIT relevant.... Wake up, Sally. Watch just a TINY bit of non-Fox News, whatever.....
so we've got millions of voters who can't vote D because of things like D candidates not willing to define what a woman is
and we've got millions of voters who can't vote R because the Rs wish to dismantle democracy and are gladly submitting to lies told to them 24/7 by an obvious criminal con man.
You would think that each party would do something to grab those alienated voters.
But nah because of our stupid primary system where mostly only the fanatics vote, candidates have to align with the nuts, not the broad central current.
I have less and less faith in the US political system every year.
(setting aside your bias/blindspots regarding democrats and republicans)
I see two paths to help diminish the problem you're talking about, with one important common feature
Path #1: Open primaries where the top 2 candidates advanced regardless of political party affiliation. Basically, do away with the party system in large part. Some states already do this for some of their elections (e.g. Washington State). It generally forces candidates to adopt a more moderate platform to reach voters from a wider base.
Path #2: A preliminary round of ranked-choice voting prior to the November election where only the top 2 candidates advance, while also encouraging third party development (so that it isn't necessarily R vs. D every time) through expanded federal funding (which is currently available if a party gets more than 5% of the national vote in the previous presidential election IIRC - but if you base it on ranked choice voting in the preliminary round while doubling the threshold, this would become available to probably 3-5 parties after every cycle). The candidates in their party primaries would continue to have to appeal to their smaller base rather than the entire national landscape, but if the candidates are too extreme they likely wouldn't make it to the November elections in the end. Ranked choice voting will give an advantage to the more tolerable (usually moderate/centrist, but not always) candidates.
As an added bonus, both routes negate the potential for third party spoilers in November and both but especially the second route takes us further away from a binary, polarized outlook that many people have and recognize there are more than two viewpoints on almost every subject and they would be encouraged to learn more about and try to better understand different viewpoints due to needing to rank candidates rather than simply vote for the one you want to support.
Ben Sasse is one of the very people on the planet more self involved than Trump and Harambe.
Wait. I MIGHT be noticing a pattern here. DON'T kiss Donny's a**, and AITR hates you. What a weird coincidence, since he's NOT a Trumper (just ask him).
I've heard the orangeman say that word for word so I don't know what that means. He lies more than 30,000 times in four years but for some reason I believe you.
Biden lied 30,000 times in his first year in office.
Biden is a sleezy con-man so he literally lies about things he's done to connect with whoever he's talking to.
No one fact checks a Delaware senator because no one cares what a Delaware senator says or thinks.
The whole "30,000 lies by Trump" thing was based on a tally by the WaPo. I have no reason to doubt the number itself--they did supply the documentation for each--but I think we should remember that their term was actually something like "false or misleading statements." So keep in mind:
*Lying implies an intent to deceive. Trump may have actually believed many of his false statements. AND
*Many of his falsehoods were repetitions, so saying the same (false) thing three times in the same day got counted as three different falsehoods, which I suppose makes sense if you're averaging 20+ a day for four years--hard to be that productively mendacious on a daily basis. BUT ALSO
*Those 30,000 were only public statements (Twitter, interview, whatever) that could be documented. No doubt he spewed many more in private.
--------------
Now, as to TAITR's assertion about 30,000 lies by Biden in his first year in office:
*That would be nearly 100 a day. That seems like a whole lot for anybody. And remember we're only tallying public falsehoods (so we can compare apples to apples). MOREOVER
*TAITR supplies no backup for his assertion--just presumably wants to square support of Donald Trump (and his falsehoods) by saying that Biden is even worse. But in contrast to the 30,000 figure for Trump, which was documented ad nauseam (and fact-checked by numerous sources), TAITR apparently simply made a statement and hoped it would be accepted. AND
*Didn't TAITR get outed, at length, as a liar a couple days ago? Like 15 or 20 pages back?
-------------
Last word: TAITR said no one checks on a DE senator, but on PolitiFact (which someone linked to recently) they actually have a couple of pants-on-fire statements from Biden from 15 years ago--which they reported at the time. So that's another confident, but false, assertion from TAITR.
TL, DR: "TheAdultInTheRoom" continues to advertise his willingness to make things up, so he can "win" his point. Kinda like Trump himself, now that I think of it.
Ben Sasse is one of the very people on the planet more self involved than Trump and Harambe.
Wait. I MIGHT be noticing a pattern here. DON'T kiss Donny's a**, and AITR hates you. What a weird coincidence, since he's NOT a Trumper (just ask him).
Utterly snowed for years by the lying, blowhard rich guy, and calling others "betas." Right.
And spare us the "I'm not a Trumper" wave off.
NO ONE who says a fraction of the reality-free things that you and your brethren say on this thread are anything other than Trump cultists. And guess what cultists never are? The "alpha" you no doubt like to fancy yourself as being. ....not to mention kids in their basement and bitter retirees.....
You're as beta as it gets you angry little man.
Oh, all of the very accurate stereotypes and rules-of-thumb you're so good at reminding us about.
Like, "Show me a guy who pretty much EVER talks about seeing the world in terms of "alphas" and "betas" and I'll show you a hugely insecure as*****."
But it also makes total sense. Mature, fairly intelligent, well-educated men DON'T think that way. And Donny easily snows all of them who DO. Like you.
Uneducated white people think it costs $250K to get a masters degree in gender studies.
You either went to a crappy school or you went to college 40 years ago.
It's like $320,000 just for tuition at the university of Michigan if you live out of state and sleep in your car.
If you go to an ivy league school a masters degree will run you closer to $500k.
The average in-state student going to a public 4-year college in the U.S. spends approximately $25,864 per year. That's over $100k for the average bachelor's degree.
The average masters program runs around $35,000.
$135k is still pretty pricey for a useless degree.
Any degree from U of Michigan is worth 300k if you’re a good student, which you probably are if you got into Michigan.
The worthless college degree is sort of a working class problem only. My degree is from a worthless college and in a field I didn’t go into. Doesn’t matter because I just needed the degree. It puts me ahead of all the other people when they start filtering résumés.
A Michigan grad with a 3.0 or greater can go work in any city at several large companies looking to hire smart kids. My ex girlfriend worked with a bunch of Michigan grads in entry level sales (at a prestigious company) and many of these kids moved up quickly and were making 6 figures by 25.
You don’t want to go into debt if you’re both poor and unable to work your way out of it. This is true for a lot of people in the working class but not so much for people with a bit of a head start.
Uneducated white people think it costs $250K to get a masters degree in gender studies.
You either went to a crappy school or you went to college 40 years ago.
It's like $320,000 just for tuition at the university of Michigan if you live out of state and sleep in your car.
If you go to an ivy league school a masters degree will run you closer to $500k.
The average in-state student going to a public 4-year college in the U.S. spends approximately $25,864 per year. That's over $100k for the average bachelor's degree.
The average masters program runs around $35,000.
$135k is still pretty pricey for a useless degree.
Full tuition in a master's program at Harvard is $52,456 per year. And most people don't pay full tuition. Oh, and you do know that master's programs are typically just 2 years, right?
Like I said, uneducated white people think it costs $250K to get a masters degree in gender studies.
Hey, it's not like there aren't GOP primaries going on all over the country right now FURTHER proving (as if any more proof were necessary) that Trump might STILL be a BIT relevant.... Wake up, Sally. Watch just a TINY bit of non-Fox News, whatever.....
How many primaries is Trump running in?
I'm just trying to decide which was the lamer, less relevant comeback, "Jim Jones (CULT leader) was a leftist," OR, "How many primaries is Trump running in?"
Biden lied 30,000 times in his first year in office.
Biden is a sleezy con-man so he literally lies about things he's done to connect with whoever he's talking to.
No one fact checks a Delaware senator because no one cares what a Delaware senator says or thinks.
The whole "30,000 lies by Trump" thing was based on a tally by the WaPo. I have no reason to doubt the number itself--they did supply the documentation for each--but I think we should remember that their term was actually something like "false or misleading statements." So keep in mind:
*Lying implies an intent to deceive. Trump may have actually believed many of his false statements. AND
*Many of his falsehoods were repetitions, so saying the same (false) thing three times in the same day got counted as three different falsehoods, which I suppose makes sense if you're averaging 20+ a day for four years--hard to be that productively mendacious on a daily basis. BUT ALSO
*Those 30,000 were only public statements (Twitter, interview, whatever) that could be documented. No doubt he spewed many more in private.
--------------
Now, as to TAITR's assertion about 30,000 lies by Biden in his first year in office:
*That would be nearly 100 a day. That seems like a whole lot for anybody. And remember we're only tallying public falsehoods (so we can compare apples to apples). MOREOVER
*TAITR supplies no backup for his assertion--just presumably wants to square support of Donald Trump (and his falsehoods) by saying that Biden is even worse. But in contrast to the 30,000 figure for Trump, which was documented ad nauseam (and fact-checked by numerous sources), TAITR apparently simply made a statement and hoped it would be accepted. AND
*Didn't TAITR get outed, at length, as a liar a couple days ago? Like 15 or 20 pages back?
-------------
Last word: TAITR said no one checks on a DE senator, but on PolitiFact (which someone linked to recently) they actually have a couple of pants-on-fire statements from Biden from 15 years ago--which they reported at the time. So that's another confident, but false, assertion from TAITR.
TL, DR: "TheAdultInTheRoom" continues to advertise his willingness to make things up, so he can "win" his point. Kinda like Trump himself, now that I think of it.
I sold Cutco knives in college. I'd go to people houses and give them little demonstrations. Part of the demo was tap one of the knives on the table to make it sing out a note. Then you'd tell them the note was a "B-sharp". Clearly a joke.
Stupid people and people on the spectrum never got the joke. I did a demonstration for a couple that were both members of a major US city's symphony. I made the b-sharp joke and the husband chuckled. The wife got up and left the room. I looked at the husband and he shrugged his shoulders and said, "She's autistic. She's probably going to get her tuner." Sure enough she returned with her tuner.
You either went to a crappy school or you went to college 40 years ago.
It's like $320,000 just for tuition at the university of Michigan if you live out of state and sleep in your car.
If you go to an ivy league school a masters degree will run you closer to $500k.
The average in-state student going to a public 4-year college in the U.S. spends approximately $25,864 per year. That's over $100k for the average bachelor's degree.
The average masters program runs around $35,000.
$135k is still pretty pricey for a useless degree.
Full tuition in a master's program at Harvard is $52,456 per year. And most people don't pay full tuition. Oh, and you do know that master's programs are typically just 2 years, right?
Like I said, uneducated white people think it costs $250K to get a masters degree in gender studies.
I have a master's degree. I know how long they take. But, because I'm not a "highly educated" liberal I also realize you need an undergraduate degree before you can get into a master's program.
Uneducated white people think it costs $250K to get a masters degree in gender studies.
If you go to an ivy league school a masters degree will run you closer to $500k.
The average in-state student going to a public 4-year college in the U.S. spends approximately $25,864 per year. . . .
The average masters program runs around $35,000.
$135k is still pretty pricey for a useless degree.
Uneducated white people think it typically takes four years to get a master's degree. Or maybe seven, if spending the average ~$35k/yr gets you to a total of "$250K."
Each of my master's degrees took two years or less. And I was working during each.
I'm just trying to decide which was the lamer, less relevant comeback, "Jim Jones (CULT leader) was a leftist," OR, "How many primaries is Trump running in?"
Looks like a tossup.
It's relevant that you cult example was literally on your own side.
Trump isn't on any ballot. He's relevant only in your own mind.
People like YOU are desperately unpopular with American voters.
If you go to an ivy league school a masters degree will run you closer to $500k.
The average in-state student going to a public 4-year college in the U.S. spends approximately $25,864 per year. . . .
The average masters program runs around $35,000.
$135k is still pretty pricey for a useless degree.
Uneducated white people think it typically takes four years to get a master's degree. Or maybe seven, if spending the average ~$35k/yr gets you to a total of "$250K."
Each of my master's degrees took two years or less. And I was working during each.
Innumerate much? Or just uneducated?
it is amazing that you people don't know you're stupid... lol.
Fun fact: degrees aren't time served. They are based on credit hours or semester hours. If you can manage all of the classes in one semester it would take one semester. If it takes you 10 years it takes you 10 years.
You cannot start a graduate program unless you have an undergraduate degree.
Are you stupid or just lying about your 900 degrees?
Elon Musk is rumored to be supporting Ron Desantis for president in 2024. Asked about it, Desantis says he’s focused on 2022, but always appreciates the support of African-Americans. This is gold. pic.twitter.com/gr0b6fHVCT