I assure you, causality does not break down at quantum levels. Can you clarify what you mean by definitive states (in terms of solutions to the Schrodinger equation)? What do you mean by indeterminate? As in, we can't solve the eigenvalue problem exactly for the particular system of interest or are you referring to something along the lines of "the wavefunction represents a probability distribution over the entirety of space"? What do you mean by unknowable? I know with great certainty that my refrigerator is going to be exactly where I left it when I come home from work because its wavefunction is very localized in my kitchen.
I assume this all stems from your confusion about the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which states that the uncertainty in an object's position multiplied by the uncertainty in its momentum is greater than or equal to hbar / 2. Here, hbar is the Planck constant divided by (2 * pi). hbar is on the order 10^(-34) J * s. That's a VERY small number, which is why quantum uncertainty doesn't manifest at macroscopic levels. So, quantum-level uncertainty is literally a very small amount of uncertainty.
When you're in a hole, the first thing you should do is stop digging.
Causality does not exist at the sub-atomic level.
You misstate Heisenberg.
In the field of quantum mechanics, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is a fundamental theory that explains why it is impossible to measure more than one quantum variable simultaneously. Another implication of the uncertainty principle is that it is impossible to accurately measure the energy of a system in some finite amount of time.
It's not a "very small amount of uncertainty".
It is total uncertainty
I assure you, I do NOT misstate Heisenberg. I put the mathematical definition of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in my post, well aware that an analogous definition in terms of time and energy can be formulated. Perhaps you would care to share that equation? What's the value of the right hand side? Is it a large number? Furthermore, could you elaborate on how this causes causality to break down? You can use bra and ket notation, if it helps, or second quantization, if you're more fluent in that notation.
Could you define "quantum variable" as you used it in your post? [I hope it was defined on whatever website you plagiarized]
Please elaborate on this phenomena that you call "total uncertainty".
Here's an example where causality does not break down: Feb. 24th - Russia invades Ukraine, sometime later, Russia retreats from Kyiv after being embarrassed repeatedly, sometime in the future, Russia implodes and Putin is overthrown.
Russian ruble's recovery masks disruptive impact of West's sanctions but it won't make Vladimir Putin seek peace Despite unprecedented sanctions and an exodus of Western companies, the Russian ruble – a widely followed indicator of the economy – has recovered all of its earlier losses. Meanwhile, billions of dollars continue to flow in from energy sales to Europe and elsewhere, which has allowed the Kremlin to keep paying its international debts.
So much for the effectiveness of American policy
Yes, along with 17% interest rates, rampant inflation, and billions of dollars flowing out of the Kremlin's coffers to prop up the Ruble. Can an ordinary citizen in Russia go to a bank and exchange 8000 Rubles for 100 USD? If not, then the exchange rate is malarky.
In the field of quantum mechanics, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is a fundamental theory that explains why it is impossible to measure more than one quantum variable simultaneously. Another implication of the uncertainty principle is that it is impossible to accurately measure the energy of a system in some finite amount of time.
It's not a "very small amount of uncertainty".
It is total uncertainty
I assure you, I do NOT misstate Heisenberg. I put the mathematical definition of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in my post, well aware that an analogous definition in terms of time and energy can be formulated. Perhaps you would care to share that equation? What's the value of the right hand side? Is it a large number? Furthermore, could you elaborate on how this causes causality to break down? You can use bra and ket notation, if it helps, or second quantization, if you're more fluent in that notation.
Could you define "quantum variable" as you used it in your post? [I hope it was defined on whatever website you plagiarized]
Please elaborate on this phenomena that you call "total uncertainty".
Here's an example where causality does not break down: Feb. 24th - Russia invades Ukraine, sometime later, Russia retreats from Kyiv after being embarrassed repeatedly, sometime in the future, Russia implodes and Putin is overthrown.
In the field of quantum mechanics, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is a fundamental theory that explains why it is impossible to measure more than one quantum variable simultaneously. Another implication of the uncertainty principle is that it is impossible to accurately measure the energy of a system in some finite amount of time.
I assure you, I do NOT misstate Heisenberg. I put the mathematical definition of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in my post, well aware that an analogous definition in terms of time and energy can be formulated. Perhaps you would care to share that equation? What's the value of the right hand side? Is it a large number? Furthermore, could you elaborate on how this causes causality to break down? You can use bra and ket notation, if it helps, or second quantization, if you're more fluent in that notation.
Could you define "quantum variable" as you used it in your post? [I hope it was defined on whatever website you plagiarized]
Please elaborate on this phenomena that you call "total uncertainty".
Here's an example where causality does not break down: Feb. 24th - Russia invades Ukraine, sometime later, Russia retreats from Kyiv after being embarrassed repeatedly, sometime in the future, Russia implodes and Putin is overthrown.
In the field of quantum mechanics, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is a fundamental theory that explains why it is impossible to measure more than one quantum variable simultaneously. Another implication of the uncertainty principle is that it is impossible to accurately measure the energy of a system in some finite amount of time.
Note the word impossible.
Note the words "quantum variable". Please define.
Your post also says it is impossible to accurately measure the energy of a system in some finite amount of time. How about if we're willing to accept a time bit of inaccuracy? What if we have an infinite amount of time? How does this show that causality breaks down at the quantum level? What is "total uncertainty"? Please, use equations. We're all waiting.
Otherwise, shut up on things you know nothing about (which, at this point, seems to be pretty much everything!)
Well, all of the pro-Putin trolls' "normal" arguments for why Russia should be able to do whatever they want have been thoroughly refuted, so now they're trying to do quantum mechanics and failing (no matter how many times carmine pastes the same plagiarized text he doesn't understand).
In the field of quantum mechanics, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is a fundamental theory that explains why it is impossible to measure more than one quantum variable simultaneously. Another implication of the uncertainty principle is that it is impossible to accurately measure the energy of a system in some finite amount of time.
Note the word impossible.
Note the words "quantum variable". Please define.
Your post also says it is impossible to accurately measure the energy of a system in some finite amount of time. How about if we're willing to accept a time bit of inaccuracy? What if we have an infinite amount of time? How does this show that causality breaks down at the quantum level? What is "total uncertainty"? Please, use equations. We're all waiting.
Otherwise, shut up on things you know nothing about (which, at this point, seems to be pretty much everything!)
You are arguing with the copy and paste I took from official science sources.
Well, all of the pro-Putin trolls' "normal" arguments for why Russia should be able to do whatever they want have been thoroughly refuted, so now they're trying to do quantum mechanics and failing (no matter how many times carmine pastes the same plagiarized text he doesn't understand).
Plagiarized?
Copy and pasting is now plagiarizing?
But only if that copy and paste proves you wrong I guess.
Your post also says it is impossible to accurately measure the energy of a system in some finite amount of time. How about if we're willing to accept a time bit of inaccuracy? What if we have an infinite amount of time? How does this show that causality breaks down at the quantum level? What is "total uncertainty"? Please, use equations. We're all waiting.
Otherwise, shut up on things you know nothing about (which, at this point, seems to be pretty much everything!)
You are arguing with the copy and paste I took from official science sources.
Did you know that?
Yes. I was absolutely certain you plagiarized the text from somewhere, as there's no way you could write anything so coherent. It's also evident that you don't understand what it says (note, I do), which is why you can't answer any of my follow-up questions. So, again, all of LRC begs of you - please stop talking about topics about which you're clueless, especially if all you're going to do is copy and paste things you don't understand (like quantum mechanics, COVID, or Putin's propaganda on Ukraine).
Well, all of the pro-Putin trolls' "normal" arguments for why Russia should be able to do whatever they want have been thoroughly refuted, so now they're trying to do quantum mechanics and failing (no matter how many times carmine pastes the same plagiarized text he doesn't understand).
Plagiarized?
Copy and pasting is now plagiarizing?
But only if that copy and paste proves you wrong I guess.
That is literally the definition of plagiarizing.
Definition of plagiarize transitive verb : to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source
to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source; to commit literary theft : present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing...
You are arguing with the copy and paste I took from official science sources.
Did you know that?
Yes. I was absolutely certain you plagiarized the text from somewhere, as there's no way you could write anything so coherent. It's also evident that you don't understand what it says (note, I do), which is why you can't answer any of my follow-up questions. So, again, all of LRC begs of you - please stop talking about topics about which you're clueless, especially if all you're going to do is copy and paste things you don't understand (like quantum mechanics, COVID, or Putin's propaganda on Ukraine).
I copied and pasted from official scientific sources.
Yes. I was absolutely certain you plagiarized the text from somewhere, as there's no way you could write anything so coherent. It's also evident that you don't understand what it says (note, I do), which is why you can't answer any of my follow-up questions. So, again, all of LRC begs of you - please stop talking about topics about which you're clueless, especially if all you're going to do is copy and paste things you don't understand (like quantum mechanics, COVID, or Putin's propaganda on Ukraine).
I copied and pasted from official scientific sources.
And you are arguing with it!
And think copy and paste is plagiarism.
Not very bright
You can't possibly this stupid, right? This has to be an act.
I assure you, I do NOT misstate Heisenberg. I put the mathematical definition of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in my post, well aware that an analogous definition in terms of time and energy can be formulated. Perhaps you would care to share that equation? What's the value of the right hand side? Is it a large number? Furthermore, could you elaborate on how this causes causality to break down? You can use bra and ket notation, if it helps, or second quantization, if you're more fluent in that notation.
Could you define "quantum variable" as you used it in your post? [I hope it was defined on whatever website you plagiarized]
Please elaborate on this phenomena that you call "total uncertainty".
Here's an example where causality does not break down: Feb. 24th - Russia invades Ukraine, sometime later, Russia retreats from Kyiv after being embarrassed repeatedly, sometime in the future, Russia implodes and Putin is overthrown.
In the field of quantum mechanics, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is a fundamental theory that explains why it is impossible to measure more than one quantum variable simultaneously. Another implication of the uncertainty principle is that it is impossible to accurately measure the energy of a system in some finite amount of time.
Note the word impossible.
You gotta stop searching the internet to make it seem like you are smarter than you really are. You might be the densest person in the world.
Russian ruble's recovery masks disruptive impact of West's sanctions but it won't make Vladimir Putin seek peace Despite unprecedented sanctions and an exodus of Western companies, the Russian ruble – a widely followed indicator of the economy – has recovered all of its earlier losses. Meanwhile, billions of dollars continue to flow in from energy sales to Europe and elsewhere, which has allowed the Kremlin to keep paying its international debts.
So much for the effectiveness of American policy
Who cares what the ruble is worth? It’s still worth around the penny in the US. People litter with pennies here.
how is the government working out for you guys? The average Russian household makes less than $7000 in US money per year.
I have made more money in the stock market in the last half an hour then you will writing these silly posts for the next four months.
Yes. I was absolutely certain you plagiarized the text from somewhere, as there's no way you could write anything so coherent. It's also evident that you don't understand what it says (note, I do), which is why you can't answer any of my follow-up questions. So, again, all of LRC begs of you - please stop talking about topics about which you're clueless, especially if all you're going to do is copy and paste things you don't understand (like quantum mechanics, COVID, or Putin's propaganda on Ukraine).
I copied and pasted from official scientific sources.
And you are arguing with it!
And think copy and paste is plagiarism.
Not very bright
Referring to the method you used to plagiarize doesn't negate the plagiarism, it only describes the mechanical act. You took someone else's work word for word, reproduced it elsewhere, and failed to credit the original source. That is plagiarism.
Moreover, the length of some of your previous plagiarist acts could well result in a copyright violation as exceeding fair use. That could be a problem for this site and the BroJos.