Why do the people against it call it a “jab” or “the jab?” It’s funny AF that they call it that because it makes it sounds like it’s some big deal. You don’t even feel anything going into the muscle area when they put it in. Such a thin AF needle. Maybe the fat guys with goatees and little education are afraid of a needle? Many of them probably haven’t been to the doctor in five years for preventive care .
I don’t get it ….even Mitch McConnell of Kentucky just got a booster “jab”
This post was removed.
2600 bro wrote:
Israel, once the anti-vax morons’ darling, confirms a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Curious what the vax fearmongers have to say?
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/covid-in-israel-the-17-unvaccinated-make-up-60-of-deaths-this-week-1.10245471
60% of that huge grand weekly total of about 115 deaths!!!!
40% of the deaths are still being seen in people already fully vaxed; how many of those "unvaxed" deaths are partially vaxed? Are they working, yeah a little bit. Anything helps right?
I'm starting not to feel bad for these people, you reap what you sow.
[quote]Mayor Leroy Cork Shildt wrote:
Why do the people against it call it a “jab” or “the jab?” It’s funny AF that they call it that because it makes it sounds like it’s some big deal. You don’t even feel anything going into the muscle area when they put it in. Such a thin AF needle. Maybe the fat guys with goatees and little education are afraid of a needle? Many of them probably haven’t been to the doctor in five years for preventive care .
It's called a jab because that's what the people pushing it call it.
Fair point. But it was tested for safety and efficacy, not addiction.
Peter Gandhi wrote:
The Unkle wrote:
They do?
Less than 8,000 Americans die each day.
Less than 100 million people watch the Super Bowl.
There are 330 million Americans.
It would seem unlikely that the 30% of the population accounts for 75% of the American deaths in the 24 hours following the Super Bowl.
Hence I would tend to conclude that you made that number up.
However, if 30% of the population is providing 75% of the deaths then we would have to conclude that whatever their behavior is during the Super Bowl is in fact killing lots of people.
Common sense
Ah, but the common element is that they all watched the Super Bowl. Watching the Super Bowl can't be simply coincidental to their deaths, not when thousands of people died after watching it. Using your logic, it must have been watching the Super Bowl that killed them! I mean, you didn't question the behavior, or the medical history, of the woman who died after getting the vaccine, you just leapt to the conclusion that it was the vaccine that killed her.
Common sense is right!
So you sticking to your claim that the 100 million of a total of 330 million Americans that watch the SuperBowl produce 6,000 of the typical 8,000 deaths per day in the 24 hours after The Game?
We both know you made that number up.
But, if 75% of the deaths did occur to the 30% of the population that watches The Game then it would be beyond doubt that the their deaths were related to The Game.
You really can't follow this simple logic?
Mayor Leroy Cork Shildt wrote:
I would bet my life it was not the vaccine. If it were it would be pulled immediately
+1 and the stock would tank.
SameStory wrote:
Fair point. But it was tested for safety and efficacy, not addiction.
Big Pharma stated it was non addictive and falsified tests to show that it was.
The FDA gave it the thumbs up -- for 20 years.
Big Pharma is criminal and the FDA is merely a subdivision of Big Pharma
BeauBidensDeadHaHa wrote:
The Clown Show wrote:
He he he. I love the reach here. So, by posting against blatant ignorance those who are ignorant (people who are still not sure about getting the vaccine) are now going to say "screw it, tired of the clown's act, I'm now not going to get it?" They are even more ignorant than previously believed.
Sorry fellas. No free ride here, Your stupidity on full display and ya'll just mad that mandates are coming to fix what you are all suffering from: stupidity.
Lemme repost this:
https://www.foxnews.com/official-polls/fox-news-poll-majorities-favor-mask-vaccine-mandates-as-pandemic-worries-increaseMajority want mandates. You don't have to like it. But if you wanna keep your job, you probably should suck it up, buttercup, and get the big bad jab.
Thanks for admitting that you haven't convinced anyone to be vaccinated. Having to put all your hope into the government forcing people to be vaccinated is proof of that.
Keep typing away, it will make sure that any fence sitters end up unvaccinated.
Im pretty sure the objective of this thread is to call out and poke fun of the anti-vaxxer crowd. Watching the anti-vaxx crowd getting irritated is funny.
Scary Stuff!!! wrote:
60% of that huge grand weekly total of about 115 deaths!!!!
40% of the deaths are still being seen in people already fully vaxed; how many of those "unvaxed" deaths are partially vaxed? Are they working, yeah a little bit. Anything helps right?
Congrats on not knowing how math works. Making you 10+x less likely to die is better than working a little bit, you dunce.
SameStory wrote:
Mayor Leroy Cork Shildt wrote:
I would bet my life it was not the vaccine. If it were it would be pulled immediately
+1 and the stock would tank.
The level of naivite to think the FDA would pull the vaccines if it killed anyone is shocking
where are your facts, bruh? wrote:
BeauBidensDeadHaHa wrote:
Thanks for admitting that you haven't convinced anyone to be vaccinated. Having to put all your hope into the government forcing people to be vaccinated is proof of that.
Keep typing away, it will make sure that any fence sitters end up unvaccinated.
Im pretty sure the objective of this thread is to call out and poke fun of the anti-vaxxer crowd. Watching the anti-vaxx crowd getting irritated is funny.
The objective of this thread is for Harambe and his alters to get as much attention as possible. I figure he's less dangerous in real life if he's preoccupied by the internet.
BeauBidensDeadHaHa wrote:
The objective of this thread is for Harambe and his alters to get as much attention as possible. I figure he's less dangerous in real life if he's preoccupied by the internet.
Nah, it's to provide a platform for the most moronic LRC troglodytes to aggressively identify themselves as denier-fearmongers (and antivaxxers).
You are doing your part, brother, I appreciate it :)
Harambe wrote:
BeauBidensDeadHaHa wrote:
The objective of this thread is for Harambe and his alters to get as much attention as possible. I figure he's less dangerous in real life if he's preoccupied by the internet.
Nah, it's to provide a platform for the most moronic LRC troglodytes to aggressively identify themselves as denier-fearmongers (and antivaxxers).
You are doing your part, brother, I appreciate it :)
Thanks, but I can't compete with how many people you've turned away from being vaccinated. I guess you should be crowned the king of moronic LRC troglodytes.
BeauBidensDeadHaHa wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Nah, it's to provide a platform for the most moronic LRC troglodytes to aggressively identify themselves as denier-fearmongers (and antivaxxers).
You are doing your part, brother, I appreciate it :)
Thanks, but I can't compete with how many people you've turned away from being vaccinated. I guess you should be crowned the king of moronic LRC troglodytes.
The answer is probably between 0 and 2.
Anyone who reads facts and data about the safety of vaccines and then decides not to get vaccinated.... wasn't going to anyway!
If you object to me being mean to aggressively dumb antivaxxers... well maybe they shouldn't come posting nonsense on this board! Always funny that people take more issue with the people calling out BS than those posting it repeatedly.
Says something about their hidden preferences.... (i.e. you're an antivaxxer)
BeauBidensDeadHaHa wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Nah, it's to provide a platform for the most moronic LRC troglodytes to aggressively identify themselves as denier-fearmongers (and antivaxxers).
You are doing your part, brother, I appreciate it :)
Thanks, but I can't compete with how many people you've turned away from being vaccinated. I guess you should be crowned the king of moronic LRC troglodytes.
You always bring a lot to the discussion!
I love how you tried weird sex jokes two pages ago (no reaction).
Now back your Harambe slobbering…
You’re getting cute :)
I’m enjoying your frustration. Especially as it does nothing to dispel the fact this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
2600 bro wrote:
BeauBidensDeadHaHa wrote:
Thanks, but I can't compete with how many people you've turned away from being vaccinated. I guess you should be crowned the king of moronic LRC troglodytes.
You always bring a lot to the discussion!
I love how you tried weird sex jokes two pages ago (no reaction).
Now back your Harambe slobbering…
You’re getting cute :)
I’m enjoying your frustration. Especially as it does nothing to dispel the fact this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Me frustrated? Absolutely not.
I'm just here so the crazy guy with several usernames can get the attention he craves.
The Unkle wrote:
SameStory wrote:
+1 and the stock would tank.
The level of naivite to think the FDA would pull the vaccines if it killed anyone is shocking
Let's say there was a negative outcome of the vaccine. This would have been discovered during the testing phase. The testing phase consists of clinicians around the world overseeing people who sign up for a research study. Every single adverse event of people in these studies is documented. So if a person gets in a car crash when they are in a study, this is documented. All of the events are then sent to an independent review board that does not include pharma or the FDA. This independent review board looks at the data and asks"Could this drug have caused this adverse event"? If this board comes back with "possibly", the trial stops until they dig more into the study participant history to see if a conclusion can be made.
In the case of the vaccine, there were no serious events that had any biological connection to the vaccine. The people you hear about who died or had some major issue "after the vaccine" would have had the same thing happen if they didn't have the vaccine. It's like the person who posted that x number of people died the day after the superbowl . Correlation does not equal causation.
States with the highest recent death rates:
Alabama 2.37 42% vaccinated
Alaska 1.52 50% vax
Florida 1.45 57%
South Carolina 1.37 47%
Oklahoma 1.16 47%
Montana 1.15 48%
West Virginia 1.15 40%
Idaho 1.13 41%
Georgia 1.10 45%
Tennessee 1.05 45%
Florida has the most average deaths recently at 311/day, Texas is next at 300.
California's recent COVID death rate is 0.27, less than 1/5 of Florida's.