439 wrote:
The Clown Show wrote:
Being stupid doesn't have a postal code.
Knowing two random people's names does?
Man, you are so dumb...
He's a great spokesperson for the unvaccinated. Nobody on the fence would take the "vaccine" after seeing that this idiot supports it.
439 wrote:
Why are you lying?
I said I support vaccination for those who want to be vaccinated. You are the main fearmonger here and you seemingly don't know what "to fearmonger" means.
I think you forgot that one, don't worry, I got you.
I love the idiots who can't even understand simple English like "I support vaccination" and then make crap up.
Self-owning fearmonger, you are risible.
My point is that people who don't want to be vaccinated are dumb. They cannot analyze simple data that shows its benefits.
There are enough dumb people in the US (including you), that we cannot stop the pandemic without, apparently, forcing the dumbos to get the vax. Hence, the current mandates.
If you and your ilk had not coddled these morons (and coddled yourself) into thinking that vaccine-fear was justifiable, we wouldn't be here.
Trying to disguise narcissism and selfishness as bland 'both-sides-ism' is not gonna work. We can see right through it.
The Clown Show wrote:
Pandemic of the unvaccinated:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/20-old-believed-too-healthy-133010446.htmlConfirmed.
Please provide links to profiles of all Americans who have been infected with Covid. The CDC estimates that number at over 120 Million as of late May. It must be at least 160 Million by now.
Thank you,
Dan M
Happily unvaccinated
Massachusetts State of Emergency declared: 2020-03-10 Days since: 567
First mRNA shots administered in the US: 2020-12-14 Days since: 288
Harambe wrote:
439 wrote:
Why are you lying?
I said I support vaccination for those who want to be vaccinated. You are the main fearmonger here and you seemingly don't know what "to fearmonger" means.
I think you forgot that one, don't worry, I got you.
I love the idiots who can't even understand simple English like "I support vaccination" and then make crap up.
Self-owning fearmonger, you are risible.
My point is that people who don't want to be vaccinated are dumb. They cannot analyze simple data that shows its benefits.
There are enough dumb people in the US (including you), that we cannot stop the pandemic without, apparently, forcing the dumbos to get the vax. Hence, the current mandates.
If you and your ilk had not coddled these morons (and coddled yourself) into thinking that vaccine-fear was justifiable, we wouldn't be here.
Trying to disguise narcissism and selfishness as bland 'both-sides-ism' is not gonna work. We can see right through it.
A guy that believes whatever the corrupt media and government tells him, calling the unvaccinated dumb. Now that's the definition of a moron.
mandatory vaccination is the same as traffic laws.
If everyone follows the same laws, we can drive safely. It's about the good of society, not a single person. Since kids can't be vaccinated yet, then it's up to the rest of society to get one so they have less chance of catching it and bringing it home to a vulnerable person.
The vaccination is not 100% but it reduces the risk of spreading it to the 10% who get covid with a vaccine and end up in the hospital.
And the only reason this vaccine was approved so fast is because every single person and entity involved with the development, testing, clinical trials and approval were told "you ONLY work on this until you pass it to the next stage".
as someone who works in clinical trials, the frustrating part of the vaccine misinformation is that the media portrays the only players in the process as pharma and the FDA. the vaccines, as all other drugs are tested at local hospitals who have doctors and coordinators who agree to monitor the patients in the study.
If a research institute who wanted to be a site for the vaccine study didn't respond to the companies with their inquiries within days, that site was not selected.
This post was removed.
The Unkle wrote:
The only pro vaxxer argument is that if you don't agree with what Big Pharma says you are a fool.
So fragile.
Panic of the unvaccinated.
Confirmed.
colder and wiser wrote:
The Unkle wrote:
The only pro vaxxer argument is that if you don't agree with what Big Pharma says you are a fool.
So fragile.
Panic of the unvaccinated.
Confirmed.
Another Harambe alter, CONFIRMED.
This post was removed.
This post was removed.
It's simply fascinating, that these sheep can trust the media/ govt /big tech/big pharma, who are first and foremost self interested and have been proven incompetent liars many times. Yet why do these sheep keep going back to their word? Because they can't think for themselves, are consumed by fear, like being told what to do, are manipulated by the guise that this is for our best health interests.
There has been zero accountability from the govt for being flat out wrong, lying and changing their story/plan numerous times. But since they don't take accountability and quickly move on to the next set of orders, people are inclined to forget and ignore the lies and errors in a fog of fear and confusion.
"Overall, we rate TrialSite News a strong Pseudoscience source based on promoting misleading and false claims regarding Covid-19 vaccines."
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/trialsite-news/
And to whoever just registered the name I was using, have fun with it!
150k people dead from vaccines?
This will be like the election fraud presentations. Sophistry, reframing, misdirection, cherry picking, and obfuscation.
It will certainly make the grifters some $$$$
Seeing the light wrote:
as someone who works in clinical trials, the frustrating part of the vaccine misinformation is that the media portrays the only players in the process as pharma and the FDA. the vaccines, as all other drugs are tested at local hospitals who have doctors and coordinators who agree to monitor the patients in the study.
If a research institute who wanted to be a site for the vaccine study didn't respond to the companies with their inquiries within days, that site was not selected.
Good post. Thanks for your insight.
The Clown Show wrote:
439 wrote:
Again, your peabrain doesn't understand simple concempts.
Just because I told you some people are against vaccination, doesn't mean I am not vaccinated. So how does that make me an antivaxxer?
You are so stupid it hurts...
Tick Tick Tick The Clown Show is a huge prick.
Tick Tick Tick you bark but don't bite, you're just a dick.
It's like you take your cues from foxnews. Tucker and Hannity have the exact same talking points.
We are in the middle of pandemic and there are vaccines that have been proven to be safe and effective. But people who choose not to get them ,aren't against them? Those were your words. Quoted above. So, how do you arrive at giving people who don't want to take a safe and effective vaccine as NOT antivaxxers?
And the fact that 1) you took the vaccine and 2) you are OK with someone who knows they work, but doesn't want to take them, makes you quite the special person. You are not an antivaxxer. But you are either full of crap or lack the faculties to be a part of this conversation.
Is your username taken from what you punch daily?
As for your question.
Could it be they have natural immunity?
Could it be they are 20 and the virus and/or threat of them becoming a vessel for the virus is so minute' that they don't see the benefit in it? And they happen to not live in a police state?
Could it be that it's their body and they have a right to decide what is put into it, good or bad?
I don't know, just some thoughts clown boy.
This post was removed.
[quote]The Unkle wrote:
The vaccine does not work.
In fact, maybe it is the actual "delta variant".
It kills.
439 wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Bingo
All these pearl clutching dudes "how dare you call me an antivaxxer for being anti-vaccine!"
Spare me.
Oh man, here is the Harambidiot for another 15h of fearmongering and attacks.
Spare me.
I don't like eating anchovies, according to the clown puncher, "Biden fixed Covid"-Harambe, and the genius 2600, this makes me anti-food. Come on man, makes complete sense!
BidenFixedCovid wrote:
As for your question.
Could it be they have natural immunity?
Vaccine + infection-driven immunity gives EXCELLENT immunity. There is a WIDE range of immune responses after infection, especially after minor infection, so it's unclear that everyone infected has the immunity they think they have.
Could it be they are 20 and the virus and/or threat of them becoming a vessel for the virus is so minute' that they don't see the benefit in it? And they happen to not live in a police state?
Being 20 does basically nothing to lower your 'threat of becoming a vessel for the virus.' And the personal risk for a 20 year old from the virus is MUCH higher than from the vaccine
Could it be that it's their body and they have a right to decide what is put into it, good or bad?
I don't know, just some thoughts clown boy.
Everyone has as a right to make dumb, uninformed, unsupported decisions. We have a right to call them antivaxxers, because that's what they are.
The antivaxxers seem to think 'personal choice' makes them immune from criticism for their total lack of critical thinking. That's snowflake talk.