CO2 is plant food. Warmer temperatures mean more farmland. Warmer temperatures mean more life.
I wish that were true. Unfortunately, adding CO2 to crops has a negative effect on nutritional yield. It can help in some circumstances, but mostly you just get a more dense, less nutritious plant. Plus, you get stronger weeds, which lowers yield as well.
And rising temperatures are really bad for crop yields in general.
It’s amazing how Biden blames Trump / Republicans for his failures yet democrats control the government. Is he really that thick? We all know that Delaware isn’t Harvard but “come on man!”
President Joe Biden appeared on Wednesday night's episode of "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" The president addressed gun control, inflation, high gas prices and took aim at Republicans and former President Trump.
It’s amazing how Biden blames Trump / Republicans for his failures yet democrats control the government. Is he really that thick? We all know that Delaware isn’t Harvard but “come on man!”
Here is a Copenhagen group saying that fossil fuels will still provide 60% of the Earth's energy in 20 years. Nothing about only being needed for large planes and ships.
Renewable energy is cheaper and more abundant than fossil fuel. Technological limitations no longer exist. It's just a matter of how fast we can scale manufacturing of solar panels and batteries.
The fossil fuel market will collapse because of higher cost.
It's true when the article says that a 2,000 mile trip is much easier in a Tesla. Tesla's charging network is far superior. But 2,000 mile trips are rare. And the other charging networks will catch up.
It's a lot more common to do shorter road trips. Anything under 7 or 8 hours is pretty easy in any EV.
CO2 is plant food. Warmer temperatures mean more farmland. Warmer temperatures mean more life.
I wish that were true. Unfortunately, adding CO2 to crops has a negative effect on nutritional yield. It can help in some circumstances, but mostly you just get a more dense, less nutritious plant. Plus, you get stronger weeds, which lowers yield as well.
And rising temperatures are really bad for crop yields in general.
You google things, read 3 sentences, and then speak as if you have any idea what you're talking about...
In greenhouses they elevate the CO2 to increase the yield of plants. This is a fact.
The CO2 level was 300ppm in 1960 and today it's over 400ppm.
In that time the yield of wheat, rice, and corn has more than doubled.
The experiment the nonsense you're spewing comes from assumed a CO2 level of 570ppm.
Even if nothing changes and we keep pumping out the CO2 like gangbusters the planet won't hit 570ppm for a VERY long time.
It's true when the article says that a 2,000 mile trip is much easier in a Tesla. Tesla's charging network is far superior. But 2,000 mile trips are rare. And the other charging networks will catch up.
It's a lot more common to do shorter road trips. Anything under 7 or 8 hours is pretty easy in any EV.
Do you actually believe the stupid things you say?
A 2,000 mile trip is "much easier in a Tesla"? Really?
Why is that exactly?
A Tesla won't make it 2,000 miles on 1 charge. Even in the dreamiest of nonsense scenarios in your mind it would require HOURS of charging to make it 2000 miles.
Meanwhile, the same trip would require about 15 minutes of pumping gas.
Or did you mean "easier" because you didn't have to squeeze the gas pump handle and you could just sleep all day while you waited for your car to charge?
Renewable energy is cheaper and more abundant than fossil fuel. Technological limitations no longer exist. It's just a matter of how fast we can scale manufacturing of solar panels and batteries.
The fossil fuel market will collapse because of higher cost.
Solar and wind are not even viable in many areas. Germany literally spent 2 TRILLION Euros to figure out the sun doesn't shine enough and the wind doesn't blow enough in Germany to meet even a fraction of their energy needs.
You're wishing out loud like a cultist. It's embarrassing.
Renewable energy is cheaper and more abundant than fossil fuel. Technological limitations no longer exist. It's just a matter of how fast we can scale manufacturing of solar panels and batteries.
The fossil fuel market will collapse because of higher cost.
Fat Hurts - you keep insisting that 90% of the vehicles sold in 2030 will have a plug.
37 milliion Americans live in poverty. Most of these are not going to be spending $50,000 or more on an electric vehicle.
1/3 of all Americans live in an apartment. Take an existing high rise building with 400 units. Let's say 600 total adults live in the building. Are you going to have 600 charging stations? The parking garage is already jam-packed. They maybe could fit 10 charging stations. Where are all of these electric vehicles going to be charged?
What about all the farmers and others who love their F-150s. Are they going to be buying electric vehicles?
I wish that were true. Unfortunately, adding CO2 to crops has a negative effect on nutritional yield. It can help in some circumstances, but mostly you just get a more dense, less nutritious plant. Plus, you get stronger weeds, which lowers yield as well.
And rising temperatures are really bad for crop yields in general.
You google things, read 3 sentences, and then speak as if you have any idea what you're talking about...
In greenhouses they elevate the CO2 to increase the yield of plants. This is a fact.
The CO2 level was 300ppm in 1960 and today it's over 400ppm.
In that time the yield of wheat, rice, and corn has more than doubled.
The experiment the nonsense you're spewing comes from assumed a CO2 level of 570ppm.
Even if nothing changes and we keep pumping out the CO2 like gangbusters the planet won't hit 570ppm for a VERY long time.
No, I've been studying this stuff for a long time.
As I said, in some circumstances, extra CO2 can help. But only to a point. Overall, it reduces nutritional yield.
And rising temperatures are really bad for crop yields in general.
It's true when the article says that a 2,000 mile trip is much easier in a Tesla. Tesla's charging network is far superior. But 2,000 mile trips are rare. And the other charging networks will catch up.
It's a lot more common to do shorter road trips. Anything under 7 or 8 hours is pretty easy in any EV.
Do you actually believe the stupid things you say?
A 2,000 mile trip is "much easier in a Tesla"? Really?
Why is that exactly?
A Tesla won't make it 2,000 miles on 1 charge. Even in the dreamiest of nonsense scenarios in your mind it would require HOURS of charging to make it 2000 miles.
Meanwhile, the same trip would require about 15 minutes of pumping gas.
Or did you mean "easier" because you didn't have to squeeze the gas pump handle and you could just sleep all day while you waited for your car to charge?
I know from experience. The Tesla charging network is better than the others.
Renewable energy is cheaper and more abundant than fossil fuel. Technological limitations no longer exist. It's just a matter of how fast we can scale manufacturing of solar panels and batteries.
The fossil fuel market will collapse because of higher cost.
Fat Hurts - you keep insisting that 90% of the vehicles sold in 2030 will have a plug.
37 milliion Americans live in poverty. Most of these are not going to be spending $50,000 or more on an electric vehicle.
1/3 of all Americans live in an apartment. Take an existing high rise building with 400 units. Let's say 600 total adults live in the building. Are you going to have 600 charging stations? The parking garage is already jam-packed. They maybe could fit 10 charging stations. Where are all of these electric vehicles going to be charged?
What about all the farmers and others who love their F-150s. Are they going to be buying electric vehicles?
Just absurd on your claim.
You don't need to spend 50K. You can already get a new EV for 25K. Used ones go for even less.
Most apartment complexes will offer charging as an amenity. You can put as many chargers as you need in any parking lot. They don't take space away from the cars themselves.
Farmers will love electric trucks even more. Electric trucks have more cargo space and they can run your power tools.
Do you actually believe the stupid things you say?
A 2,000 mile trip is "much easier in a Tesla"? Really?
Why is that exactly?
A Tesla won't make it 2,000 miles on 1 charge. Even in the dreamiest of nonsense scenarios in your mind it would require HOURS of charging to make it 2000 miles.
Meanwhile, the same trip would require about 15 minutes of pumping gas.
Or did you mean "easier" because you didn't have to squeeze the gas pump handle and you could just sleep all day while you waited for your car to charge?
I know from experience. The Tesla charging network is better than the others.
I'm not talking about a comparison with gas cars.
Normal humans compare EV's to gas cars.
You're expecting everyone on earth to have an EV in 8 years but you don't want them to compare their current car to the EV??
Teslas are better than Volt's. Great! Most people don't want want to spend HOURS charging their car on a road trip. Even in the dreamiest scenario it takes 15 minutes to charge a Tesla for 200 miles. In this 2000 mile trip you'd still be spending 2 1/2 hours waiting for your car to charge. Most people would prefer to take their normal car and spend 15 minutes at the pump. Until you overcome that hurdle there's no way in hell a majority of people will switch to EV's.
It’s amazing how Biden blames Trump / Republicans for his failures yet democrats control the government. Is he really that thick? We all know that Delaware isn’t Harvard but “come on man!”
That posters on a politics message board don't know it takes 60 votes in the senate to pass bills.
The majority of the Senate and House has voted for Democratic-sponsored bills... but in this crazy country having more votes doesn't automatically get you the win or the policy.
