Pretty lame, Milhouseina. That weak sarc attempt you just tried to double down on died within days of the Indictment. The uninformed Magonalites have moved on to pretending fraudulent electors are legal.
A false equivalence or false equivalency is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. Colloquially...
TheAd......room, You said I was lying when I said Biden wasn't for defunding the police. You were shown to have been wrong and to be spreading disinformation. You should have acknowledged your error, but instead you just posted it doesn't matter.
Well it mattered enough for you to call others a liar about that fact.
This is a person who said somewhere above-- people may have missed it--, and I'm paraphrasing here "Even if your worst fantasies about Donald Trump are true, Joe Biden is still worse".
Even if we indulge him on the "fantasies" part, here's what he's claiming Joe Biden's conduct as person and President has fallen below:
1. Rapist/serial molester of women (might be some comparison to be made here, but sheer scale surely matters).
2. Racist (again, some comparisons to be made, but...)
3. Mocker of the handicapped.
4. Corrupt business man (to put it in the mildest possible terms).
5. Violator or his Presidential Oath of Office.
6. Inciter of mob violence/public intimidation of truly powerless people, such as poll workers.
7. Coup-maker against the lawful government of his country.
Others could feel free to add more.
This thread is being lengthened by an obvious troll and our inability to stop replying to him and his aliases. There will be reason in the near future to discuss the Trump indictments, but everyone should agree to just block this guy.
P.S. To prove that I recognize just how sh*tty person Joe Biden truly is (though still nowhere near Trump's league on this metric-- he's just a great example of what's odious about every run-of-the-mill corporate Democrat since at least Bill Clinton, and very real risks are being taken in nominating him again), here's a great long-form and very well documented political takedown of the man, for your reading pleasure:
Regarding your PS, just don't EVER kid yourself that showing your balance EVER means ANYTHING to those who have no balance.
These are the same people who talked themselves into Liz Cheney being their enemy because she had the nerve to point out the blindingly obvious about Trump.
Just curious, should indictments be handed down to anyone who maintains that Al Gore won the election over Bush?
Maintain? No.
Ask state officials to find votes and assign fake alternate electors and send supporters storming the Capitol to force Gore himself to send the vote to the House as a Contingent Election? Yes.
Asking, not sending, supporters to the Capitol to peacefully protest (with flags). I know you like to stray from reality…
funny how you’ve actually scrubbed Trumps actual words from the entire Internet. And then came up with new ones
That is the sort of statement (unnecessary war for profit) many liberals made about Iraq / Afghanistan wars. Can you enlighten us as to who is nefariously profiting?
The same people who profited from Iraq and Afghanistan. Why was it believable to you then but not now?
Weapons maker have lobbyists. Lobbyists have politicians they work with. Politicians have donors.
Trump tried to end the war in Afghanistan and half of the establishment GoP turned on him. Life long republican neo-cons woke up Democrats.
Forever war is what Eisenhower warned us about. Pointless wars for profit.
The ghost of Ike has been monitoring this site, and he just politely asked that you NEVER, EVER, EVER invoke his name. You. Just you. Do him the favor.
Ask state officials to find votes and assign fake alternate electors and send supporters storming the Capitol to force Gore himself to send the vote to the House as a Contingent Election? Yes.
Asking, not sending, supporters to the Capitol to peacefully protest (with flags). I know you like to stray from reality…
funny how you’ve actually scrubbed Trumps actual words from the entire Internet. And then came up with new ones
They all have received there talking points are have been rehearsing them for months.
1. Joe Biden's own son calls him "Pedo Pete". His own daughter says he abused her. He's never met a toddler he didn't try to grope and sniff. He confessed to letting kids rub his legs at the pool before he famously defeated Corn Pop in single combat. He was accused of sexual assault by an aide in the 90s. He's no better than Trump.
2. Biden is racist AF. You can see hours of footage of him being racist on YouTube. No better than Trump who amazingly has never been captured on film or audio actually being racist.
3. This story has been debunked. He mocks all reporters the same way and had no idea who that guy was until after the fact.
4. Biden is a corrupt politician which is much worse than a corrupt businessman because all of the money he's using is yours.
5. Biden failed the same oath. The southern border alone is grounds for impeachment.
6. Biden's party cheered on and offered to bail out the people who burned down half the country in 2020.
7. Democrats tried to rig the 2016 election and successfully rigged the 2020 election.
Burying your head in the sand and stuffing your fingers in your ears doesn't change the way half the country thinks. You are so shocked by my views because you tune out any source of information that doesn't confirm your bias.
1. All lies, except for the single accusation stemming from an alleged encounter in the 1990s, for which there’s substantial reason to doubt the accuser. But this carries more weight than the sixteen accusations against Trump? Than the women who said he’d barge into the changing room at the Miss Teen USA contests?
2. Biden said a lot of racist stuff in the past. Aren’t we glad he’s changed his tone.
3. No it hasn’t. Show us Trump doing the same thing for Bob Woodward.
4. Taken at face value, I would agree. However, Biden’s general character coupled with his life experience mean that he actually respects the rule of law, something that Trump does not. As the chief executive of the United States, Trump demands loyalty to himself over the country and its Constitution. There’s a difference between policy disagreements and agreeing that even the President is accountable to and bound within the constraints of the law.
5. Disagree. A giant wall is neither practical nor humane. Besides the fact that most illegal immigrants enter this country legally, the best way to reduce illegal crossings is to foster better conditions in their countries of origin.
6. Half the country was burned down? I think you’re getting this Maui news mixed up in your noggin.
7. No they didn’t and no they didn’t. I could say that Trump killed 47 million bunnies and it would be just as reliable a statement based on the evidence at hand. Also, the bunnies were invisible and that’s why you didn’t see it on the news.
How many people have to tell you that you have blinders on and have been brainwashed before you go, “maybe I’m wrong?” I understand it is a hard thing to break from.
1. Perhaps if Democrats didn't accuse every single one of their opponents of something horrible it wouldn't be so easy to ignore their claims.
2. He hasn't changed his spots just his tone.
3. Not in your bubble I'm sure but in the normal world there's plenty of video evidence which shows that those mannerisms are how Trump demonstrates someone saying something he thinks is stupid.
4. Biden's been a POS his whole life. From trying to smear the truck driver his drunk wife ran into to lying about everything under the sun in the 1988 presidential election to being corrupt and gropey.
5. Walls a very practical that's why we use them all over the planet. People abusing the visa programs isn't a very good reason to ignore the border. And how the hell is is "inhumane" to acknowledge borders??
6. Democrats rioted every day all summer in 2020. They did billions in damage and killed dozens of people.
7. The FBI, the media, the Obama administration and Clinton campaign worked hand in hand to try to push the Russian collusion narrative that they all knew was fake in 2016. They did the same thing in 2020 by censoring the Biden laptop.
Give me a logical, factual reason to believe I'm wrong and I'll believe it. You've given me an easily refutable list of emotional disagreements.
The same people who profited from Iraq and Afghanistan. Why was it believable to you then but not now?
Weapons maker have lobbyists. Lobbyists have politicians they work with. Politicians have donors.
Trump tried to end the war in Afghanistan and half of the establishment GoP turned on him. Life long republican neo-cons woke up Democrats.
Forever war is what Eisenhower warned us about. Pointless wars for profit.
The ghost of Ike has been monitoring this site, and he just politely asked that you NEVER, EVER, EVER invoke his name. You. Just you. Do him the favor.
Eisenhower was a war veteran. He would spit in your stolen valor face you lying POS.
If you think he'd be on board with your leftist delusions you're insane. Eisenhower was a Republican.
He was complementing you and saying that he didn't think you were stupid enough to believe the stupid premise underlying your lame attempt at sarcasm. He wasn't advocating Wikipedia.
It is extremely strange to me how the parties have completely flipped roles regarding wars (and the funding of them) as well as the precarious position of the first amendment. If someone told me this would happen 20 years ago, I would have never believed it.
In other news, you all (we, I guess) are on day 17 and post 2250. Over 6 pages a day. That's a lot!
He was complementing you and saying that he didn't think you were stupid enough to believe the stupid premise underlying your lame attempt at sarcasm. He wasn't advocating Wikipedia.
Compliment accepted. I guess you don't know the difference between complimenting and complementing. Did you skip that year in school? "Complementing" means improving on something. Adding to something. "Complimenting" means praise politely. You are welcome in advance. If you need further clarification, come back! I am more than happy to assist you.
He was complementing you and saying that he didn't think you were stupid enough to believe the stupid premise underlying your lame attempt at sarcasm. He wasn't advocating Wikipedia.
If you don't know the difference between complementing and complimenting, you just might want to go to one of Greg's threads. They are kind of dumbed down, if you get my drift.
The ghost of Ike has been monitoring this site, and he just politely asked that you NEVER, EVER, EVER invoke his name. You. Just you. Do him the favor.
Eisenhower was a war veteran. He would spit in your stolen valor face you lying POS.
If you think he'd be on board with your leftist delusions you're insane. Eisenhower was a Republican.
Since some of you might be new here, just an update that will surprise you ZERO about adolt:
I'm a veteran. A long time ago, adolt decided that he didn't like the fact that I referenced it in some way (because he's massively insecure, I'm sure). So, he decided to completely fabricate my military biography, claim that I lied about it, and rolled out his cute "stolen valor" phrase that he repeats all the time.
He was invited many times to prove it, and always refused, of course.
So, he's a guy who not only lies about veterans, but he goes out of his way to use the particularly nasty "stolen valor" phrase, certainly meant to imply that I've lied about or embellished my combat record.
As you DO know, if you've read just a few pages, he's one of the worst human beings you'll ever see on this site.
adolt, I have enjoyed watching you bleed from the a** even more than usual on this site in recent weeks. Masochism personified.
1. Improving on horrible isn't that feather in your cap you think it is. Crime is a bigger problem than you realize. San Francisco told all of its federal workers to telework because it's too dangerous to come to the federal building. Major retailers are abandoning cities because the leftist DA's won't prosecute shoplifters.
2. I'm for parents. You're for the nanny state. Washington state just passed a law allowing the state to hide runaways from their parents if they want a sex change or an abortion. Decent parents don't want the state making these decisions with their child in secret.
3. Joe Biden is the leader of the party that ran on defunding the police. It doesn't matter what he personally thinks. Black men commit a disproportionate amount of crime so they have a disproportionate amount of run-ins with the police. Studies show black cops are more likely to kill a black perp than white cops are. The cops are racist BS is just Democrats sowing division for votes like they always do.
4. Al Qaeda was in Afghanistan not Saudi Arabia because the Saudi government threw him out in 1991. Democrats voted to go into Iraq right along with the Republicans. The uniparty is a thing.
5. Do you know any women? The pro-life movement is run by women.
6. You don't need an opinion piece to figure out people should be allowed to decide how to spend their own money.
1) it's been horrible because the world fell apart for 3 years! It began during the Trump administration, and by sandbagging on getting federal aid out quickly, many communities, and especially communities of color in big cities were the first to suffer, and suffered the most. Any similar scenario throughout history includes large increases in crimes because people are in dire straights. Now that all of the federal money that went out under the first 2 years of the Biden administration is starting to take effect, predictably, the economy is improving, and with it, lower crime rates.
2) Children have a right to the medicine and medical procedures needed to allow them to live happy, healthy lives. Diabetic kids need insulin. Kids with ADHD need their meds. Trans kids need hormones or hormone blockers. It's a health care issue, not an ethical debate. If you're listening to bible thumpers and politicians on this one, instead of doctors and scientists, you're on the wrong team. Also, there were fewer than 300 top surgeries performed on children in the U.S. last year. Over 5000 died from gun violence. If you're so concerned about kids lives, why are you focusing on the former issue, which kills no kids, and not the latter, which kills an insane amount. Again, you're on the wrong team.
3) Well, at least we now know that you are explicitly racist. Thanks for clarifying. You're making the case that skin color is causational with crime rates. Skin color is incidental. Economic class is the actual predictor of crime rates. Those in low income brackets commit crimes at higher rates than those in middle or upper income brackets. Gee, maybe because they're desperate and have no f*cking money to live?! But this raises the issue of why Black people are more likely to have lower income rates than white people, and since I'm sure you've opened a history book at some point in your life, perhaps we can discuss the overarching issues here, which is the 250 years of slavery, 100 years of Jim Crow, and continued economic, political, and social legislation that still relegate people of color to second-rate status and I *think* we might start to understand the economic connection. Or maybe you're trying to come up with a list of all the valuable skills that Black folks learned as slaves, right? *slams palm into forehead*
4) Who. Funded. Al Qaeda. And why didn't we go after Saudi Arabia?! (we already know the answer). Also, what about Iraq?
5) The fact that some women might be in leadership positions of the anti-choice movement doesn't mean that that is reflective of what women in America think about reproductive rights. Support for reproductive healthcare is at an all-time high, and growing fast after last year's SCOTUS decision. 62% of women in the U.S. now favor comprehensive reproductive rights, which is up SEVEN points from 55% just 3 years ago. Women are pissed, and in case you've had your head in the sand, you'll notice that every state measure that's come up since that awful decision has favored our side. Get ready for a whole lot more of those.
6) Hey I agree... rich people can spend their money on themselves if they want to. I don't think we should be a society that relies on charity from the wealthy. We should tax them fairly and progressively. Right now, the wealthiest often pay significantly less as a percentage of their income than working and middle class folks do, and that simply isn't fair.
7) I'm hoping that you were posting that last one a joke, because once you bring in ANYTHING from MTG and claim it as a serious point, you've lost the argument. Nice try.
He was complementing you and saying that he didn't think you were stupid enough to believe the stupid premise underlying your lame attempt at sarcasm. He wasn't advocating Wikipedia.
Compliment accepted. I guess you don't know the difference between complimenting and complementing. Did you skip that year in school? "Complementing" means improving on something. Adding to something. "Complimenting" means praise politely. You are welcome in advance. If you need further clarification, come back! I am more than happy to assist you.
Thank you for spotting the typo. Maybe some day I can return the favor.
Compliment accepted. I guess you don't know the difference between complimenting and complementing. Did you skip that year in school? "Complementing" means improving on something. Adding to something. "Complimenting" means praise politely. You are welcome in advance. If you need further clarification, come back! I am more than happy to assist you.
Thank you for spotting the typo. Maybe some day I can return the favor.
Eisenhower was a war veteran. He would spit in your stolen valor face you lying POS.
If you think he'd be on board with your leftist delusions you're insane. Eisenhower was a Republican.
Since some of you might be new here, just an update that will surprise you ZERO about adolt:
I'm a veteran. A long time ago, adolt decided that he didn't like the fact that I referenced it in some way (because he's massively insecure, I'm sure). So, he decided to completely fabricate my military biography, claim that I lied about it, and rolled out his cute "stolen valor" phrase that he repeats all the time.
He was invited many times to prove it, and always refused, of course.
So, he's a guy who not only lies about veterans, but he goes out of his way to use the particularly nasty "stolen valor" phrase, certainly meant to imply that I've lied about or embellished my combat record.
As you DO know, if you've read just a few pages, he's one of the worst human beings you'll ever see on this site.
adolt, I have enjoyed watching you bleed from the a** even more than usual on this site in recent weeks. Masochism personified.
It would be easy for you clarify your service but no you'd rather pretend it never happened. How convenient that you post under 15 different monikers.
You've been whining about getting caught lying about your service for months now. I think if you were ever actually in the Navy you'd have a better understanding of what rectal bleeding actually looks like.
Asking, not sending, supporters to the Capitol to peacefully protest (with flags). I know you like to stray from reality…
funny how you’ve actually scrubbed Trumps actual words from the entire Internet. And then came up with new ones
They all have received there talking points are have been rehearsing them for months.
No doubt. Sure is nifty how they create new words and statements out of thin air. Then throw the guy in chains and follow up claiming they’ve seen the trial results. Truly about as weak as you can get.