Here are the cartoons that got 12 innocent people at Charlie Hebdo slaughtered

Here is a thought experiment to this phrase:

"Well, freedom of speech is fine and all but they are taking their chances and got what's coming to them"

What % of Muslims worldwide would agree with that phrase?

What % of Christians would agree with that if 2 crazy christians shot up an magazine newsroom for mocking Jesus?

I'd venture a majority of muslims would agree with that phrase and therefore are tolerant to these attacks. A very small % of Christians would do the same.

Jeff,

Again the irrelevant anti gun arguments have been unequivocally reject by American Citizens over and over again. That will never change so you are wasting your time with the faux liberal anti gun arguments. America is not buying it and no one is listening to it but an extremely small faction of leftist extremist whom have no bearing on the RKBA.

There is more to just the presence of Guns to Japan vs The U.S.

Your Blind Ideological views will never allow you to see it.

Why not compare the death rate due to medical mal practice (Which kills more than any gun in the U.S.A) to that of the medical malpractice on the moon?

A 2014 Quinnipiac University poll found that 92% of Americans and 92% of gun owners support having background checks on all gun sales. A 2013 New York Times poll found that 63% support restrictions on high capacity magazines. These widely supported opinions don't find their way into successful legislation because lobbying groups are able to cajole significant numbers of legislatures into refusing to support even the most widely supported forms of gun control legislation.

So a lack of access to guns doesn't necessarily mean that private citizens are more likely to be the victims of a crime?

Open letter to Wejo,Please ban this Tyrannosauras Rexing character, if not for us then do it for his own good. The guy is a loose cannon. Check my IP Wejo, I encourage you too and you'll see that I'm none of the posters who this whack job keeps responding to with his sick demented responses. This guy has gotta go Wejo, please.Letsrun Observer

Again, clinging to your faux liberal arguments is a waste of time. Yours and mine.

That last time politicians decided to ban guns based on cosmetic features and magazine capacity they all lost their jobs. The same happened again in places like CO.

Reality does not align with your fantasy no matter how many times you may repeat it.

Can't decide who is more of a cancer. Atheists or Muslims. Probably atheists.

Loot wrote:

Can't decide who is more of a cancer. Atheists or Muslims. Probably atheists.

That was weird.

Quick, of the last 10 terrorist attacks committed worldwide (or in the US if you wish) how many were committed in the name of atheism?

Seriously dude, WTF?

Scary Black Man wrote:

I understand radical Islam for what it is... EVIL.

You don't rationalize with evil, you kill it.

And how exactly does one kill an ideology? Good luck trying to kill every single person who is now or may one day become a radical Muslim.

Of the most cancerous terrorist governments in last 100 years, how many were atheist?

Let's see-

Mao's China, Lenin's Russia, Stalin's Russia, Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's Italy, Castro's Cuba...

Wejo will check my IP and you will be wrong, hence me insisting on it. I teach Psychology at a college in Michigan, yes I'm serious. I also run having done the FPM in October (almost got under 3 hours, good for my age). I've read dozens of posts on this thread. You need to reread things. You really need help, badly. Life's existence/purpose is not to continually go around goading people into arguments and fights because someone disagrees with you. Seek help, talk to someone soon before you get too far gone. Medication could seriously help. Please look into it.

Loot wrote:

Of the most cancerous terrorist governments in last 100 years, how many were atheist?

Let's see-

Mao's China, Lenin's Russia, Stalin's Russia, Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's Italy, Castro's Cuba...

You seem to be confusing communism with atheism.

I know it is difficult but start with the first letters. Communism starts with the letter 'C'. In this way it is similar to 'cookie', 'Catholicism', 'cable' and 'Coca-cola'. Atheism starts with the letter 'A'. In this way it is similar to 'apple', 'Angie's List', 'aptitude' and 'ant'.

See, it really isn't that difficult.

You seem to be sinking back in to denial because of how quickly I obliterated your dumb comment.

Loot wrote:

You seem to be sinking back in to denial because of how quickly I obliterated your dumb comment.

I see. So you are not quite up to the ABCs yet, huh? Little wonder then that you had trouble understanding what has been written here.

T Rexing, don't you know it is "fewer guns" and not "less guns?"

Those first responders to arrive at massacre in Paris were cops riding bikes with billy clubs. They were sitting ducks. If citizens with guns had guns nearby they could have intervened and saved those poor, defenseless cops. You liberals are nutty!

agip wrote:

outstanding column from David Brooks today - excerpt:

Just look at all the people who have overreacted to campus micro-aggressions. The University of Illinois fired a professor who taught the Roman Catholic view on homosexuality. The University of Kansas suspended a professor for writing a harsh tweet against the N.R.A. Vanderbilt University derecognized a Christian group that insisted that it be led by Christians.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/09/opinion/david-brooks-i-am-not-charlie-hebdo.html?_r=0

campus leftists need to STFU, right now.

Micro-agression is my new favorite word. It shows how far we are supposed to go not to offend. People can get offended by anything these days so we have to magically let the PC police determine what is offensive and not offensive.

Microaggression and the college textbooks coming with warning labels that content may be offensive. When I first read about it I would have thought it was a joke in the Onion but it was in the NYTimes.

Scary Black Man wrote:

Again, clinging to your faux liberal arguments is a waste of time. Yours and mine.

You haven't refuted what I've written.

Scary Black Man wrote:

That last time politicians decided to ban guns based on cosmetic features and magazine capacity they all lost their jobs. The same happened again in places like CO.

And that conflicts with what I wrote about politicians rebuffing broad public sentiment to note draw the ire of powerful lobbying groups how? You don't deny that most Americans favor background checks on all gun sales or that most support restrictions on high capacity magazine sales.

Scary Black Man wrote:

Reality does not align with your fantasy no matter how many times you may repeat it.

I'm still waiting to hear how, if lack of access to firearms makes a private citizen more likely to be a victim than one who has the ability to arm themselves, then why homicides in Japan are so infrequent in the face of their extremely restrictive gun ownership laws. Because criminals will just flout the law anyway, right?

That makes liberals and terrorists on the same side of the issue. Neither expect to be ever offended by those that think differently.

Sally V wrote:

T Rexing, don't you know it is "fewer guns" and not "less guns?"

Thanks for the correction Sally. Hey, how many tackles did Lawrence Taylor have in his career again, what was that number you told us again, was it ZERO??

Sally V wrote:Those first responders to arrive at massacre in Paris were cops riding bikes with billy clubs. They were sitting ducks. If citizens with guns had guns nearby they could have intervened and saved those poor, defenseless cops. You liberals are nutty!

If you actually read the post you quoted, you'd realize:

I ALREADY said I support cops having guns. What was your point?

And as far as your rebuttal that "If citizens with guns had guns nearby they could have intervened", I already pointed out that LOTS of americans are armed, armed to the hilt, and somehow the "great intervention" where they all swoop in with their guns to save all the good guys from the bad guys with guns never occurs. We have WAY more mass killings like this than Europe does. This was france's worst massacre in over a decade. We have one similar to this like once a month. So much for: more guns would solve the problem. That's laughable. It doesn't stop it here. No, it makes is MORE LIKELY to occur and you know it.

wejo wrote:

the college textbooks coming with warning labels that content may be offensive. When I first read about it I would have thought it was a joke in the Onion but it was in the NYTimes.

Did you also think it was a joke from the Onion when you read that Texas PUBLIC schools teach creationism, and that Rick Perry was BRAGGING about it at a campaign stop?? (despite the fact that doing so is violation of federal law)

Or did that not bother you?