What does it mean?
1) English comprehension is a challenge for you.
2) You butted into a conversation that was finished.
3) You did not identify any errors in my post, nor correct anything I said.
4) You were confused about the topic of the brief exchange between me and "consistency".
5) You wrongly assumed my post was about Coe's quote of "doping positives", and not about two faults with the BBC Africa's quote of "serving bans".
6) You wrongly concluded that the AIU's published data of "12% serving bans are Kenyan" diminishes, or was meant to diminish, Coe's unrelated quote of "40% doping positives are Kenyan".
7) You blamed me for your confusion and lack of awareness and lack of comprehension. (See also point 1)
8) You accused me of conflating two quotes after I clearly said that they were different.
9) In fact you wrongly conflated the two quotes.
10) You wrongly accused me of diversion for talking about the BBC quote that "consistency" linked and quoted.
11) I gave two corrections regarding the BBC quote. You did not dispute these.
12) When you cannot argue with merit, you object to form, and create another diversion.