Earlier on this thread you claimed that most people who raise objections to the unfairness being done to women and girls in the name of "trans inclusion" in sports is motivated solely by "transphobia. Nothing more."
To back up your claim, you said that if fairness was the concern of posters like me "then explain all the rage about a third division that solves that competitive fairness issue completely. That made it very clear exactly what the people making the biggest fuss are so upset about. hint: It's not fairness."
In response,I politely asked you to please explain exactly how adding a third division that pretends physical sex differences either don't exist or don't matter in sports "solves the competitive fairness issue completely like you claim. A request which you have pointedly ignored in a manner typical of the way some men pretend not to hear pesky questions put to them by women they find annoying.
My impression is that most people would have no problem whatsoever with additional new divisions being created - so long as they were designed in such as way that they'd truly solve the issue of fairness and safety, or they'd at least go a long ways in attempting to do so. I know I personally would have no problem with that.
BTW, contrary to your claims, since World Boxing Council recently announced it was going to start two new divisions for trans athletes, there have been no hyperbolic articles, hissy fits, transphobic threads, or any kind of hue and cry that I've seen or heard about from the general public, the boxing community, athletes in other sports, sports fans, ardent advocates of female-only sports, and those skeptical and critical of the trans movement and the ideology behind it.
But what WBC is planning to do is very different to adding of a single third division for non-binary people of both sexes in events like the NYC Marathon and USA Cyclocross have done - especially as even after USA Cyclocross added the new non-binary category (which was won entirely by males, of course), the governing body still has continued to allow males who say they "identify as" women to compete in all women's events too.
So again: please explain exactly how adding a single third division for trans-identified people of both sexes "solves the competitive fairness issue completely" like you keep asserting it does.
You can go on calling me and others transphobic, hyperbolic throwers of hissy-fits until the proverbial cows come home, but that still won't divert readers from noticing that you haven't made any coherent, convincing arguments for your positions. Strip away the ad hominems and there's not much there.
Also, I suspect I am not the only one reading this thread who is reminded by your name-calling posts of the old proverb about how people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Truth is, you yourself seem to have a good deal of sexist prejudice against female people and chauvinism and favoritism towards male people. Because the only trans and non-binary athletes you seem to care about and take into account are the male ones. Otherwise you wouldn't keep claiming that adding a single mixed-sex third division which pretends athletes' actual sex is immaterial would "solve pretty much the entire issue..."
