yeah I know. I've been thinking the uvalde kid might be a republican, you know, demographically speaking. Considering how quick you are to label all black criminals democrats, I think it's fair.
85%+ of African-Americans vote Democrat. It's not that hard to figure out which party most black criminals identify with.
Prison surveys confirm it.
The reason prisoners might identify with the Democratic party is because Democrats are more likely to support humane treatment of prisoners.
Always amusing to watch you fail to actually read your links... or if you do actually read them you don't understand what they say... lol.
Jefferson said that Christianity would be the best religion in a republic, especially one like the United States with a broad diversity of ethnicities and religions. “[T]he Christian religion when divested of the rags in which they [the clergy] have inveloped it, and brought to the original purity & simplicity of its benevolent institutor, is a religion of all others most friendly to liberty, science, & the freest expression of the human mind,” he explained.
The chief author of the Bill of Rights was James Madison. Not sure why you are arguing about Jefferson in this context.
America was founded and built on Judeo-Christian principles even if it hurts your feelings.
Our Constitution guarantees that the government is not founded on any religious principles at all.
The "Establishment Clause" was put into the Constitution to make sure that nobody would be persecuted for their religious beliefs. The Baptists were the main proponents because they were the ones being persecuted at the time. It's safe to say that Baptists were the reason we have freedom of religion in America today.
Now Southern Baptists and other evangelicals are the main proponents of Christian Nationalism.
If we want to make an appeal to how this country was founded we should consider how today's Southern Baptists are traitors to their own heritage.
The liberal is incapable of comprehending anything but their own point of view.
It is impossible for them to understand that 18th century men didn't view the world like they do.
Our Constitution guarantees that the government is not founded on any religious principles at all.
The "Establishment Clause" was put into the Constitution to make sure that nobody would be persecuted for their religious beliefs. The Baptists were the main proponents because they were the ones being persecuted at the time. It's safe to say that Baptists were the reason we have freedom of religion in America today.
Now Southern Baptists and other evangelicals are the main proponents of Christian Nationalism.
If we want to make an appeal to how this country was founded we should consider how today's Southern Baptists are traitors to their own heritage.
The liberal is incapable of comprehending anything but their own point of view.
It is impossible for them to understand that 18th century men didn't view the world like they do.
I guess you must agree with me since you offered no actual rebuttal at all. That's good.
Our Constitution guarantees that the government is not founded on any religious principles at all.
The "Establishment Clause" was put into the Constitution to make sure that nobody would be persecuted for their religious beliefs. The Baptists were the main proponents because they were the ones being persecuted at the time. It's safe to say that Baptists were the reason we have freedom of religion in America today.
Now Southern Baptists and other evangelicals are the main proponents of Christian Nationalism.
If we want to make an appeal to how this country was founded we should consider how today's Southern Baptists are traitors to their own heritage.
The liberal is incapable of comprehending anything but their own point of view.
It is impossible for them to understand that 18th century men didn't view the world like they do.
Yes - in the 18th century they thought it was necessary for everyone to have the right to bear arms and wander round schools with them.
The liberal is incapable of comprehending anything but their own point of view.
It is impossible for them to understand that 18th century men didn't view the world like they do.
I guess you must agree with me since you offered no actual rebuttal at all. That's good.
Whether or nor there is separation between church and state has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not the country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. The entire western world is founded on Judeo-Christian principles.
YOU were shaped by Judeo-Christian principles because you live in a society which was created by them.
The liberal is incapable of comprehending anything but their own point of view.
It is impossible for them to understand that 18th century men didn't view the world like they do.
Yes - in the 18th century they thought it was necessary for everyone to have the right to bear arms and wander round schools with them.
In the 18th century there weren't nearly as many amoral morons running around so weapons weren't a danger to anyone.
Decent human beings do not commit murder. Liberal policies created multiple generations of morons who are essentially feral after growing up without decent parents.
If gun crime really bothers you stop voting for the party that creates it.
I guess you must agree with me since you offered no actual rebuttal at all. That's good.
Whether or nor there is separation between church and state has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not the country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. The entire western world is founded on Judeo-Christian principles.
YOU were shaped by Judeo-Christian principles because you live in a society which was created by them.
Correct. Separation of church and state matters when it comes to the law, which is the important thing here.
That's why we must resist the Christian Nationalism that is being pushed by evangelicals. It is un-American to put these ideas into law. Furthermore, it also violates their own religious doctrine.
Whether or nor there is separation between church and state has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not the country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. The entire western world is founded on Judeo-Christian principles.
YOU were shaped by Judeo-Christian principles because you live in a society which was created by them.
Correct. Separation of church and state matters when it comes to the law, which is the important thing here.
That's why we must resist the Christian Nationalism that is being pushed by evangelicals. It is un-American to put these ideas into law. Furthermore, it also violates their own religious doctrine.
You really need to get out of your bubble... No one is worried about "Christian Nationalism" but leftists...
Correct. Separation of church and state matters when it comes to the law, which is the important thing here.
That's why we must resist the Christian Nationalism that is being pushed by evangelicals. It is un-American to put these ideas into law. Furthermore, it also violates their own religious doctrine.
You really need to get out of your bubble... No one is worried about "Christian Nationalism" but leftists...
The left thinks the state is the church.
Yea, nobody was worried when Trump called for a Muslim ban. Nothing to worry about there.
Christian nationalism is a threat to American values, and a threat to Christianity.
In reality, Christian nationalism and White nationalism are the same thing. Both see other races and religions as a threat instead of a strength.
Always amusing to watch you fail to actually read your links... or if you do actually read them you don't understand what they say... lol.
Jefferson said that Christianity would be the best religion in a republic, especially one like the United States with a broad diversity of ethnicities and religions. “[T]he Christian religion when divested of the rags in which they [the clergy] have inveloped it, and brought to the original purity & simplicity of its benevolent institutor, is a religion of all others most friendly to liberty, science, & the freest expression of the human mind,” he explained.
The chief author of the Bill of Rights was James Madison. Not sure why you are arguing about Jefferson in this context.
He wrote the Declaration of Independence. But it doesn't matter. Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, Monroe... they were all Deists.
"The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance. No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion. Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between Church and State.' [...] The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. SCOTUS (9-0), Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15-16 and 18 (1947). [Emphases mine.]
You really need to get out of your bubble... No one is worried about "Christian Nationalism" but leftists...
The left thinks the state is the church.
Yea, nobody was worried when Trump called for a Muslim ban. Nothing to worry about there.
Christian nationalism is a threat to American values, and a threat to Christianity.
In reality, Christian nationalism and White nationalism are the same thing. Both see other races and religions as a threat instead of a strength.
Fat Hurts - why do you keep parroting the liberal lies and insist on calling it a Muslim ban? It was not a Muslim ban. Why do I say that? The most populous Muslim nations in the world are Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Egypt and Nigeria. NOT ONE of those countries was included on the "Muslim" ban. Please never call it that again or you are lying when hyou have been corrected.
Yea, nobody was worried when Trump called for a Muslim ban. Nothing to worry about there.
Christian nationalism is a threat to American values, and a threat to Christianity.
In reality, Christian nationalism and White nationalism are the same thing. Both see other races and religions as a threat instead of a strength.
Fat Hurts - why do you keep parroting the liberal lies and insist on calling it a Muslim ban? It was not a Muslim ban. Why do I say that? The most populous Muslim nations in the world are Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Egypt and Nigeria. NOT ONE of those countries was included on the "Muslim" ban. Please never call it that again or you are lying when hyou have been corrected.
I was just about to point this out. You said it perfectly. It was not a Muslim ban in the slightest. It was a ban of people from countries where proper vetting could not be done.
You really need to get out of your bubble... No one is worried about "Christian Nationalism" but leftists...
The left thinks the state is the church.
Yea, nobody was worried when Trump called for a Muslim ban. Nothing to worry about there.
Christian nationalism is a threat to American values, and a threat to Christianity.
In reality, Christian nationalism and White nationalism are the same thing. Both see other races and religions as a threat instead of a strength.
You mean the "Muslim ban" that didn't include pretty much any of the world's largest Muslim countries? The "Muslim ban" that included North Korea and Venezuela?
You literally get ALL of your information through a leftist lens. You have no idea what's happening in the world... lol.
Fat Hurts - why do you keep parroting the liberal lies and insist on calling it a Muslim ban? It was not a Muslim ban. Why do I say that? The most populous Muslim nations in the world are Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Egypt and Nigeria. NOT ONE of those countries was included on the "Muslim" ban. Please never call it that again or you are lying when hyou have been corrected.
I was just about to point this out. You said it perfectly. It was not a Muslim ban in the slightest. It was a ban of people from countries where proper vetting could not be done.
Here are the countries banned in the "Muslim"ban and the most populous Muslim countries:
Countries banned:
Yemen
Venezuela
North Korea
Somalia
Syria
All are home to bases of international terrorism.
Here the the most populous Muslim countries:
Top 10 Countries with the Largest Number of Muslims (2021): Indonesia (231,000,000) Pakistan (212,300,000) India (200,000,000) Bangladesh (153,700,000) Nigeria (95,000,000–103,000,000) Egypt (85,000,000–90,000,000) Iran (82,500,000) Turkey (74,432,725)
yeah I know. I've been thinking the uvalde kid might be a republican, you know, demographically speaking. Considering how quick you are to label all black criminals democrats, I think it's fair.
85%+ of African-Americans vote Democrat. It's not that hard to figure out which party most black criminals identify with.
Prison surveys confirm it.
Right and most Hispanics from Texas identify as Republicans right? So the kid was a Republican. That’s your logic.