I'm not Flagpole, honey.
Nicklebacker55 wrote:
Hi Flagpole!
I'm not Flagpole, honey.
Nicklebacker55 wrote:
Hi Flagpole!
Noticer of dominance wrote:
I'm not Flagpole, honey.
Nicklebacker55 wrote:
Hi Flagpole!
You are doing it all wrong. Here, try this instead:
I AM NOT FLAGPOLE! WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK. IF I AM FLAGPOLE THEN BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!
///
But I have to admit I liked your "honey". Nice touch!
Nobody bans me, sugar lump. I can change handles and am not committing a banned offense.
Noticer of dominance wrote:
I'm not Flagpole, honey.
Nicklebacker55 wrote:
Hi Flagpole!
Sure thing sweetie pie:)
Noticer of dominance wrote:
Nobody bans me, sugar lump. I can change handles and am not committing a banned offense.
"sugar lump"? Ooooooohh!!! I'm gonna need a cold shower if you keep this up!
Takes1-2-no-1 wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Just another normal day at the WH:
Conway violated the hatch Act - twice
Sam Nunberg goes into hiding
More questions about Ichan's steel stock dumping
Just like the Clinton days, right?
Even between election and inauguration Trump had far eclipsed any level of criminality and drama in Clinton’s 8 years. But yeah you can keep hanging on to that one.
Trollminator wrote:
Takes1-2-no-1 wrote:
Just like the Clinton days, right?
Even between election and inauguration Trump had far eclipsed any level of criminality and drama in Clinton’s 8 years. But yeah you can keep hanging on to that one.
Really. Clinton was found guilty of lying under oath in a Federal court and suborning perjury. What crime has Trump committed?
DiscoGary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Even between election and inauguration Trump had far eclipsed any level of criminality and drama in Clinton’s 8 years. But yeah you can keep hanging on to that one.
Really. Clinton was found guilty of lying under oath in a Federal court and suborning perjury. What crime has Trump committed?
That's yet to be determined, but when he testifies for Mueller he's sure to commit perjury in the first 30 seconds. The godless Trump is a lie machine.
DiscoGary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Even between election and inauguration Trump had far eclipsed any level of criminality and drama in Clinton’s 8 years. But yeah you can keep hanging on to that one.
Really. Clinton was found guilty of lying under oath in a Federal court and suborning perjury. What crime has Trump committed?
That's what the Mueller investigation is determin- oh wait, you think that's a government coup. Nevermind.
1) There is no snow in Ohio today. Probably due to global warming (thanks Republicans!)
2) What I posted was NOT subjective in any way. It is by all accounts absolutely ridiculous for a person to believe they can ignore a subpoena and get away with it. Nunberg learned a little yesterday and has now said he will cooperate. The legal experts he spoke with were dumfounded that he felt he wouldn't end up in jail by not cooperating.
3) Also no need for me to "grow up". It was ridiculous for DG to suggest that people should not comply with Mueller's requests. Some things are empirically so, and that was one of them.
Try harder next time you wish to criticize me. This one of yours fell flat.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Count Chocula wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Really. Clinton was found guilty of lying under oath in a Federal court and suborning perjury. What crime has Trump committed?
That's what the Mueller investigation is determin- oh wait, you think that's a government coup. Nevermind.
Right. No crimes. Only a government coup.
DiscoGary wrote:
Count Chocula wrote:
That's what the Mueller investigation is determin- oh wait, you think that's a government coup. Nevermind.
Right. No crimes. Only a government coup.
DiscoGary,
So, I'm going to just straight up and ask you here:
If Mueller finds Trump crimes (conspiracy, obstruction of justice, money laundering, perjury, or anything else), will you accept his ruling?
I will answer the opposing question -- Will I accept Mueller's answer if he finds NO crimes committed by Trump or his campaign? Yes I will.
Flagpole wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Right. No crimes. Only a government coup.
DiscoGary,
So, I'm going to just straight up and ask you here:
If Mueller finds Trump crimes (conspiracy, obstruction of justice, money laundering, perjury, or anything else), will you accept his ruling?
I will answer the opposing question -- Will I accept Mueller's answer if he finds NO crimes committed by Trump or his campaign? Yes I will.
No. This investigation is illegal. A special council can only be created to investigate a crime, and no crime was specified when the council was created, so this is an illegitimate witch hunt. Also, the FISA warrant was obtained under illegal circumstances, Trump officials were illegally unmasked by our national security goon squads, our FBI is corrupt and has been working to undermine the President since before he took office, the people working on this council are corrupt scorched Earth Democrats and they are not "independent or impartial", and NO illegal activity by Obama, Hillary, or any of their officials was investigated with one thousandth the energy that has been thrown at Trump.
This is a government coup. This is pure corruption. I will not accept anything they say. We can not have our own government working to overturn the results of an election. That path leads to mass bloodshed. This should be ended today, and any reasonable Democrat should demand that it end for the sake of the country.
Unfortunately there are NO Democrats willing to put country before party.
... and who gives sh!t what you will accept or not?
I think we're going to find out that Trump is a witch, so the hunt is justified.
1) Ok. Interesting. You are 100% wrong, but interesting.
2) Why do you insist on spelling counsel as "council". I see you bolding the last three letters there. Doesn't make it right. Interesting parallel of you trying to slip that spelling by and constant gas-lighting by the President and his staff. If Trump says "there was no collusion" enough times, that will make it true, right?
3) "600.1 Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.
The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and -
(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and
(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter."
Rosenstein noted that B above was his reason, and the vast majority of legal experts agree that there was basis for the special counsel.
4) The government is not working to overturn an election. They are looking into probable criminal behavior by the one elected. Are you saying that anyone who is elected is above the law and above reproach? If the tables were turned and Trump were a Democrat, would you be so adamant that he were being railroaded? Integrity lies only in an answer of yes from you.
5) This should not be ended today. Integrity isn't always firmly on the side of Democrats or Republicans, but in this case, it lies squarely with Democrats.
Mueller is coming (legally).
The clown is done.
L L wrote:
I think we're going to find out that Trump is a witch, so the hunt is justified.
Peasants: We have found a witch! (A witch! a witch!)
Burn her burn her!
Peasant 1: We have found a witch, may we burn her?
(cheers)
Vladimir: How do you known she is a witch?
P2: She looks like one!
V: Bring her forward
(advance)
Woman: I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!
V: ehh... but you are dressed like one.
W: They dressed me up like this!
All: naah no we didn't... no.
W: And this isn't my nose, it's a false one.
(V lifts up carrot)
V: Well?
P1: Well we did do the nose
V: The nose?
P1: ...And the hat, but she is a witch!
(all: yeah, burn her burn her!)
V: Did you dress her up like this?
P1: No! (no no... no) Yes. (yes yeah) a bit (a bit bit a bit) But she has got a wart!
(P3 points at wart)
V: What makes you think she is a witch?
P2: Well, she turned me into a newt!
V: A newt?!
(P2 pause & look around)
P2: I got better.
(pause)
P3: Burn her anyway! (burn her burn her burn!)
(king walks in)
V: There are ways of telling whether she is a witch.
P1: Are there? Well then tell us! (tell us)
V: Tell me... what do you do with witches?
P3: Burn'em! Burn them up! (burn burn burn)
V: What do you burn apart from witches?
P1: More witches! (P2 nudge P1)
(pause)
P3: Wood!
V: So, why do witches burn?
(long pause)
P2: Cuz they're made of... wood?
V: Gooood.
(crowd congratulates P2)
V: So, how do we tell if she is made of wood?
P1: Build a bridge out of her!
V: Ahh, but can you not also make bridges out of stone?
P1: Oh yeah...
V: Does wood sink in water?
P1: No
P3: No. It floats!
P1: Let's throw her into the bog! (yeah yeah ya!)
V: What also floats in water?
P1: Bread
P3: Apples
P2: Very small rocks
(V looks annoyed)
P1: Cider
P3: Grape gravy
P1: Cherries
P3: Mud
King: A Duck!
(all look and stare at king)
V: Exactly! So, logically...
P1(thinking): If she weighs the same as a duck... she's made of wood!
V: And therefore,
(pause & think)
P3: A witch! (P1: a witch)(P2: a witch)(all: a witch!)
V: We shall use my largest scales.
Trollminator wrote:
Takes1-2-no-1 wrote:
Just like the Clinton days, right?
Even between election and inauguration Trump had far eclipsed any level of criminality and drama in Clinton’s 8 years. But yeah you can keep hanging on to that one.
And you can keep your panties in a bunch for 7 more years cutie pie
Can you post anything more ignorant and pathetic than that? Is it possible?
Sorry you were wrong again. Trump still rules and you're the one looking like a clown, LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!
Noticer of dominance wrote:
I'm not Flagpole, honey.
Nicklebacker55 wrote:
Hi Flagpole!
U sound really hot for a liberal---hugs baby bear:)
You would not be able to handle me. I'd be getting warmed up and you would be passed out.