It is amazing how little the Trumpers know about what happened that day. It's like they haven't heard any news since January 6th.
The convicted insurrectionists have told the story in open court. But you haven't heard what they said until you logged into a running site.
It was such a widespread plan carried out by the GoP itself that no one on earth knows the details to this day but 4 guys arrested for loitering in the Capitol, leftist conspiracy theorists and Adam Schiff.
Trumpers don't know the details because they refuse to listen to what has been said in open court by people convicted of seditious conspiracy.
The January 6th committee knows a lot more than we do. They have interviewed hundreds of witnesses and reviewed thousands of documents. Soon, those details will be laid out. But Trumpers will still refuse to listen. Trumpers will refuse to watch the videos of the violence. Trumpers will refuse to listen to the testimony laid out by members of their own party.
Trumpers will refuse to grasp what is obvious to the rest of the world.
Bill Barr ordered the DOJ to investigate the possibility of charging BLM and antifa leaders with sedition, and they came up with nothing.
I think you misunderstand the discussion. I never suggested BLM riots should have resulted in anyone getting charged with sedition, I said that both BLM and January 6 started off as peaceful protests that devolved into riots; Fat hurts disagrees, but refuses to acknowledge the double standard in doing so.
You refuse to acknowledge that the BLM riots were fundamentally different from January 6th.
In the thousands of BLM protests, there was not a single instance of a planned and executed attack on the government. But we know for a fact that the attack on our capitol was planned and executed by militia groups. Nothing remotely like that happened with BLM.
I don't know where you think the double-standard is. A double-standard requires comparing things that are alike but treating them differently. BLM and January 6th were not alike.
I think you misunderstand the discussion. I never suggested BLM riots should have resulted in anyone getting charged with sedition, I said that both BLM and January 6 started off as peaceful protests that devolved into riots; Fat hurts disagrees, but refuses to acknowledge the double standard in doing so.
You refuse to acknowledge that the BLM riots were fundamentally different from January 6th.
In the thousands of BLM protests, there was not a single instance of a planned and executed attack on the government. But we know for a fact that the attack on our capitol was planned and executed by militia groups. Nothing remotely like that happened with BLM.
I don't know where you think the double-standard is. A double-standard requires comparing things that are alike but treating them differently. BLM and January 6th were not alike.
"I don't know where you think the double-standard is. A double-standard requires comparing things that are alike but treating them differently. BLM and January 6th were not alike."
This is a key point and gets to a major point....the right wingers fundamentally don't see Jan 6 as an attack on the government of the USA. They see it as a protest that got out of hand.
But I'm 100% sure if that if leftists had done on Jan 6 what the mag'as did on Jan 6, they *would* see Jan 6 as an attack on the US government. If you want a double standard, there it is.
I have no hope they will do that, of course. 'Conservatives' see themselves as the true expression of America and that lets them excuse all kinds of bad behavior, even sedition and insurrection. Many still don't condemn the Confederate States of America because you know...conservative, states rights, DC aggression whatever. Those who defend the Jan 6 people today will be considered as bad Americans, like most consider Jeff Davis' krew.
She is happy to state it publicly bc she knows the laws will not be enforced against her in our politicized system. A conservative would be arrested on sight for this. https://t.co/rgK5MaQAH9
Trumpers don't know the details because they refuse to listen to what has been said in open court by people convicted of seditious conspiracy.
I don't think Fox News, Newsmax or OAN reported any of the seditious conspiracy charges. If it is not on those cable news, it didn't happen, as far as mag'as are concerned.
All democrats have rejected Christ and embraced democrat evils.
Judgement Day awaits all democrats.
If Biden, Psaki and many other Democrats had any deceny they would have discouraged activists protesting at the homes of SC justices. Instead, they tacitly approved with their silence. Just a shame but that is how Dems roll ... they will do anything it takes to win. Damn the consequences.
All democrats have rejected Christ and embraced democrat evils.
Judgement Day awaits all democrats.
If Biden, Psaki and many other Democrats had any deceny they would have discouraged activists protesting at the homes of SC justices. Instead, they tacitly approved with their silence. Just a shame but that is how Dems roll ... they will do anything it takes to win. Damn the consequences.
Yup, nothing new. Like when in Seattle the most radical city council member led the protesters straight to the Mayor's home, which had been kept confidential because of death threats issued to her and her family due to her time serving as a US Attorney under Obama's administration. The left has no desire to protect anyone they disagree with at that moment, meanwhile the far left chants that they want to literally chop off anyone's head who dares to disagrees with them (re: Seattle protests in 2020 when they talked about wanting to emulate the Reign of Terror).
If Biden, Psaki and many other Democrats had any deceny they would have discouraged activists protesting at the homes of SC justices. Instead, they tacitly approved with their silence. Just a shame but that is how Dems roll ... they will do anything it takes to win. Damn the consequences.
Yup, nothing new. Like when in Seattle the most radical city council member led the protesters straight to the Mayor's home, which had been kept confidential because of death threats issued to her and her family due to her time serving as a US Attorney under Obama's administration. The left has no desire to protect anyone they disagree with at that moment, meanwhile the far left chants that they want to literally chop off anyone's head who dares to disagrees with them (re: Seattle protests in 2020 when they talked about wanting to emulate the Reign of Terror).
Yup, nothing new. Like when in Seattle the most radical city council member led the protesters straight to the Mayor's home, which had been kept confidential because of death threats issued to her and her family due to her time serving as a US Attorney under Obama's administration. The left has no desire to protect anyone they disagree with at that moment, meanwhile the far left chants that they want to literally chop off anyone's head who dares to disagrees with them (re: Seattle protests in 2020 when they talked about wanting to emulate the Reign of Terror).
literally!
Yes, literally. Did you never hear about that? Or were you too busy claiming that everyone who disagrees with you simply doesn't have all the information?
Here's how The United States President, Donald Trump, makes and spends his billions.Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TopTrendingFollow us on Twi...
Yes, literally. Did you never hear about that? Or were you too busy claiming that everyone who disagrees with you simply doesn't have all the information?
educate me on the reign of terror desired in Seattle Washington. Lay some links on me man.
Yes, literally. Did you never hear about that? Or were you too busy claiming that everyone who disagrees with you simply doesn't have all the information?
educate me on the reign of terror desired in Seattle Washington. Lay some links on me man.
or maybe you'd rather talk about how the far right often chanted to chop the head off the Vice President.
Or maybe you think since they couldn't *actually* chop that head off, it's meaningless.
Yes, literally. Did you never hear about that? Or were you too busy claiming that everyone who disagrees with you simply doesn't have all the information?
educate me on the reign of terror desired in Seattle Washington. Lay some links on me man.
Agip, you are reasonable guy. You know how Biden could have defused the situation with activists perhaps causing harm to the SC justices and their kids. But you Liberals never do what is right. Always what is more advantageous to your situation. I find it so sad that you put your party above what is right.
educate me on the reign of terror desired in Seattle Washington. Lay some links on me man.
Agip, you are reasonable guy. You know how Biden could have defused the situation with activists perhaps causing harm to the SC justices and their kids. But you Liberals never do what is right. Always what is more advantageous to your situation. I find it so sad that you put your party above what is right.
it's tricky on this...if Biden starts talking about *not* going to the homes of SCOTUS justices suddenly it becomes a much bigger deal and the AOC types make it a point to defy biden and actually go there. Making at-home prostests much larter.
All in all, it's probably best that Biden not give the home-visitors a megaphone.
At this point in the US, no one should be protesting in front of public officials' homes.
Agip, you are reasonable guy. You know how Biden could have defused the situation with activists perhaps causing harm to the SC justices and their kids. But you Liberals never do what is right. Always what is more advantageous to your situation. I find it so sad that you put your party above what is right.
it's tricky on this...if Biden starts talking about *not* going to the homes of SCOTUS justices suddenly it becomes a much bigger deal and the AOC types make it a point to defy biden and actually go there. Making at-home prostests much larter.
All in all, it's probably best that Biden not give the home-visitors a megaphone.
At this point in the US, no one should be protesting in front of public officials' homes.
Wow, Agip. You just earned some major brownie points. I am very impressed.
Yes, literally. Did you never hear about that? Or were you too busy claiming that everyone who disagrees with you simply doesn't have all the information?
educate me on the reign of terror desired in Seattle Washington. Lay some links on me man.
this is a short video clip that doesn't cover all that was said that day, but you can see the gist of it:
