Official LRC President Joseph R Biden Thread

Sorry you don't like democracy.

Roe v. Wade forced a view that was far to the left of most Americans on every state.

Now we get to see where the voters come down on the issue in every state.

So if there is something the government does that you don't like, it means you don't like democracy. Got it.

weird thinking.

only around 28% of Americans want to overturn Roe. So you somehow have twisted that into meaning....into meaning...oh I have no idea what you mean.

Only 34% of Americans think abortion should be legal after the first trimester.

Roe prevented that from becoming law, anywhere.

Do you not see the problem here?

People will favor overturning Roe once they are better educated on the subject. They've obviously been lied to about it.

So here are the leading stories on some of the top conservative web sites. Why isn't anyone on the right crowing about the Alito decision? Isn't this what you all wanted?

Newsmax: "Overturning Roe v. Wade won't outlaw abortion"

Fox News: "Alito's leaked draft abortion opinion echoes RGB's warning about Roe v. Wade"

One America: "US diplomats to reopen embassy in Kyiv"

Washington Times: "Roe v. Wade outcry comes with U.S. abortion rate at historic low"

Washington Examiner: "Trump runs the table: Trump goes 55-0, no endorsements lost"

RedState: "Ohio and Indiana Primary Results Show President Trump's Influence Is Huge but the Real Test Awaits Him in Georgia"

I don't understand the legal and practical issues around abortions past the first trimester so I can't comment on that.

But fact is, if your concern is a breakdown of democracy, my dear you have this all twisted backwards. There is, and always has been, a majority of people in this country that wish abortion to remain legal. Yet a dozen or two dozen states will make all abortions illegal the minute they can.

Only around 28% of Americans want to change the status quo of Roe.

And somehow you are portraying this is a victory for democracy. Weird. What other things do you wish to do against the majority will? Serious question.

Well that's the problem.

Roe v. Wade prevents states from making abortion illegal after the first trimester, which is what most voters want, especially in red states.

Does it make sense now?

I don't believe a word you write, sorry.

You posted the poll that said only 34% of Americans think abortion should be legal after the 1st trimester. I assume you believe that.

Roe v. Wade prevents states from doing that. Is that the part you don't believe?

and this is why I don't believe a word you write. Apparently Roe allows state governments to do exactly the thing you said they couldn't do: Ban/severely restrict abortions after the first trimester. Unless I am missing something like the 'mother's health' sort of thing.
So are you lying about this? If so, why? Are you lying?

The Supreme Court ruled that a woman had the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion, and the three trimesters of pregnancy were used as a framework for its legality. In the first trimester, governments could not prohibit a woman from choosing to have an abortion as long as a licensed physician did it. In the second trimester, governments could enact medical regulations regarding abortions as long as they were tailored to protect the mother's health. In the third trimester, governments could legally prohibit all abortions unless the procedure was necessary to protect the mother's life or health.

This proved me correct. Governments could not ban abortion in the 2nd trimester (again, something a majority of people want). They could only regulate in the cases where the mother's health was in danger.

well I'm over my head here medically and legally, but a quick scan of state by state laws suggests that many states in the Confederacy have in fact banned abortion after the first trimester despite your clain that they cannot do that.

So I still don't trust a word you write because I think you are a liar.

And those laws were being challenged and would have been struck down if the Roe v Wade precedent held. In fact, the Mississippi 15-week ban is what started this case. Why exactly did you think that law was being challenged?

Now do you get it?

I’m over my ski tips and will back off but I do think you are lying. And that you have some weird definitions of what democracy demands of us.

#MAGAAKAG

#ChristianityRocks

I bet this piece will be replayed on RT over and over...

Tucker Carlson says US involvement in the Ukraine war is meant to 'cause regime change in Moscow' as 'payback for the 2016 election'

"We don't arm Ukraine so we can help the Ukrainians. They are merely unfortunate pawns in all of this," the Fox News host said. "We arm Ukraine so that we can punish Russia. Why? For stealing Hillary Clinton's coronation."

As usual, leftist protests ALWAYS result in violence.

townhall.com

Biden: I'm Not Prepared to Leave Abortion to the 'Whims of the Public'

Leah Barkoukis

Link:townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/20...

Brandon acting like a dictator again and again.