No big deal - former potus' instinct was to shoot protestors. What could go wrong with a president with those instincts?
Sam Stein @samstein
- Fmr Defense Secretary Mark Esper charges in a memoir out May 10 that former President Trump said when demonstrators were filling the streets around the WH following the death of George Floyd: "Can't you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?"
No big deal - former potus' instinct was to shoot protestors. What could go wrong with a president with those instincts?
Sam Stein @samstein
- Fmr Defense Secretary Mark Esper charges in a memoir out May 10 that former President Trump said when demonstrators were filling the streets around the WH following the death of George Floyd: "Can't you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?"
You're not paying enough attention. Didn't you hear? That's JUST his personality. Just his "style." Not an actual (massive) character or governing or leadership flaw. 4 more years !!
hah - Gary's probably most of the spammy angry sh/tposts on the thread
It would be interesting if there was only 1 Trumper on this thread. Disguised in 1 of roughly 3 flavors: 1) just mindlessly sends cartoons from bitter retirees, 2) just says "wrong thread," and, 3) (the premier version) does type additional words, but makes nothing but pathetic and/or un-American and/or dishonest arguments.
Alas, unlikely. You don't get to 47% of the vote without there being LOTS of Gary's out there....
Trans non-binary Texas middle school teacher explains how she incorporates discussions about queerness and transness in the classroom pic.twitter.com/8O19j44oYr
hah - Gary's probably most of the spammy angry sh/tposts on the thread
It would be interesting if there was only 1 Trumper on this thread. Disguised in 1 of roughly 3 flavors: 1) just mindlessly sends cartoons from bitter retirees, 2) just says "wrong thread," and, 3) (the premier version) does type additional words, but makes nothing but pathetic and/or un-American and/or dishonest arguments.
Alas, unlikely. You don't get to 47% of the vote without there being LOTS of Gary's out there....
Take out New York and California and Trump won the popular vote in the other 48 states.
There are more blue haired morons who voted 100 times out there than "Gary's" I assure you.
It would be interesting if there was only 1 Trumper on this thread. Disguised in 1 of roughly 3 flavors: 1) just mindlessly sends cartoons from bitter retirees, 2) just says "wrong thread," and, 3) (the premier version) does type additional words, but makes nothing but pathetic and/or un-American and/or dishonest arguments.
Alas, unlikely. You don't get to 47% of the vote without there being LOTS of Gary's out there....
Take out New York and California and Trump won the popular vote in the other 48 states.
There are more blue haired morons who voted 100 times out there than "Gary's" I assure you.
Oh, you assured me. Now I'm assured. All the cheating you can't begin to prove.
Of course, it still misses the point. My parting point was that, unfortunately, there are TONS of Gary's and you's out there. Doesn't make the corresponding views defensible. They're not.
Oh, and since your side has fully, 100% embraced dishonesty, I can't EVEN assume that your CA/NY vote counting claim is accurate.
Oh, and about pretzels: If the vote counts you don't like are so untrustworthy, how the hell can you know that any of vote metrics you DO like are good? I'll answer for you: You don't. Because you're not seeking truth, and you'll ignore it when you run across it.
It would be interesting if there was only 1 Trumper on this thread. Disguised in 1 of roughly 3 flavors: 1) just mindlessly sends cartoons from bitter retirees, 2) just says "wrong thread," and, 3) (the premier version) does type additional words, but makes nothing but pathetic and/or un-American and/or dishonest arguments.
Alas, unlikely. You don't get to 47% of the vote without there being LOTS of Gary's out there....
Take out New York and California and Trump won the popular vote in the other 48 states.
Dumbest argument ever.
Maybe if you take out Texas, the Democrats won every popular vote since Regan.
The Supreme Court rules 9-0 that Boston (and by extension state and fed government) buildings may fly the Christian flag on their grounds. Boston had a law in place prohibiting this and SCOTUS ruled that city law is a violation of the First Amendment.
Just more evidence that Democrat & Christian is impossible.
What does this have anything to do with Democrats? Aren't Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson Democrats?
And why does it have anything to do with Christian? Isn't Kagan Jewish?
The Supreme Court rules 9-0 that Boston (and by extension state and fed government) buildings may fly the Christian flag on their grounds. Boston had a law in place prohibiting this and SCOTUS ruled that city law is a violation of the First Amendment.
Just more evidence that Democrat & Christian is impossible.
Are you OK with the fact that flag rules state that the Christian flag must fly lower or be given less prominence than the American flag? That's what will happen now.
As a Christian, I think the Christian flag should have prominence over the American flag. So I'd just rather not see them flown together than to follow the US flag rules.