Antonio Cabral wrote:
Look Toro. I disagree with you.
Why ?
I post on this board since long ago, some 10 years probably. I never ever opened one thread about Lydiard. The more i did posts about many subjects. Search on this board and i did contribute with thousand of posts that are out of the Lydiad debate. I bet that i did post about more different training subjects out fo Lydiard that those that accused me to spoil every Lydiard debate. If you want you can check. I did post about a large variety of training subjects.
I never ever opened one thread about Lydiard. I just confine to post on this board on Lydiard threads that were opened for someone else and ever after that many Lidiardists and other non-Lydiardists had post their own ideas.
For example check how many posts HRE or Kershall or Nobby did about the Lydiard subject. Kershall once writes that the percent of LRC posts abot Lydiard is some 97% of his gotal contribution. It´s written on this board.
And you did suggest that i stop posting about Lydiard ?
Therefore the debate about Lydiard wasn´t my suggest, my idea or my main interest. However i guess that is very important to the Lydiardism and to everyone not just the apology but also the contradictory.
If you what that i don´t post about Lydiard, it´s easy. Don´t open Lydiard threads and don´t come with the Lydiard subjects on public debate. But in fact we are not just bombardier by all kinds of Lydiard silly posts as well as my personal debate.
Finally. if got some interest that i answer to one your question out of Lydiard you got my email address or open one thread, or profit another thread that the subject is out of Lydiard. In the Lydiard threads i just try to post about what is related with Lydiard to not be accused unjust by spoil Lydiard threads while move the debate to another subject.
- I never accused you of opening all these Lydiard threads
- I'm not suggesting that you should stop talking about Lydiard
But you are not reallly talking about what the thread is about, "Does the Lydiard/Wetmore system do enough to develop speed?"
Its not called: "Why was Lydiard wrong" or "Lydiard contradicted himself".
I don't suggest you stop posting about Lydiard, but its very clear you disagree with him on many points and I don't think it help much to make that point over and over when its not really answering the question of the thread. It was not meant as an insult, apologies if it seemed harsh.
"However i guess that is very important to the Lydiardism and to everyone not just the apology but also the contradictory."
I guess you are right, but it just seemed not to contribute to the thread. But like I said, perhaps I was wrong. Its like you said, good to se both sides.
I'm not going to bother you with emails, I'm sure you are quite busy. But I'll make a thread asking you about this and if you have time/interest you can reply there.