First, they are not truly contemporaries in the way you suggest. Peak Bekele was 2000-10 and peak Kipchoge was 2010-present. Also, this win counting is just a stupid way to compare them. When your dominant event is the marathon of course you can’t wrack up as many wins and titles as you can in the 5/10/xc. Head to head match ups are dumb too. Bekele seems incapable of beating Kipchoge in the marathon. That Kipchoge did not get more chances to prove this is not on EK. I’ll say it again, Kipchoge’s dominance in the marathon is greater and more remarkable than Bekele’s at the shorter distances. If you are the fastest 5000 runner in the world, you generally win. That’s just not the history of the marathon. To win with the consistency of EK over this many years is a freakish accomplishment not even hinted at by the other great marathoners. Let’s not discount the 1:59:40 either. I know all the purists hate it, but it was a significant achievement. Yes, KB popped a great run in Berlin, but yes, EK took him down in 2003. These are one offs. Tell me, would you rather have won 2 marathon majors, a silver and two bronze majors and have the 2nd fastest time ever, or win a WC 5000, WC silver, world junior xc gold, Olympic silver and bronze. Close call. I’ll take Kipchoge.