Not even wrong wrote:
I'm all for facts, but as a matter of logic, Rojo's analysis proves nothing. We can't tell whether JG finished where he did because he ran too far by comparing him to one runner. To see whether running so far did JG in, we need to compare him to everyone, to see how far they ran.
To see the problem, just look at Centro & Engels. The race video shows clearly that they both ignored Rojo's advice. Neither of them ran on rail for the entire race. In fact, they both ran the first 800 at the outside of lane 1/inside of lane 2. Like JG, they ran quite a bit more than BB, yet they both beat BB easily.
I'm not saying that distance doesn't matter. I'm pretty sure it does. I'm only saying that distance isn't the only thing that matters. Other things, such as surging, also matter.
Did you read my article as well as watch the video? I quote JK saying the surging was worse than the distance and said you only get two moves and he did those before the bell.
Yes a full analysis would analyze everyone. I did Engels on my own. By my estimation he ran 2.8 more meters than Blankenship. So hardly any more than BB.
Today, I analyze Prakel and Wynne's tactics as I agree that it's best to analyze everyone if possible:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48_BXZP2Yg4