So when you say "originally" you don't mean "at first" or "the first time." Got it.
So when you say "originally" you don't mean "at first" or "the first time." Got it.
The Royal Box wrote:
Oh Please wrote:
That's a shame. I've always wished we could go back to a marathon being 40km like it was originally thereby making 20km the half marathon distance. I know that is likely to never happen, but it's fun to think about it. Hell, 50km makes more sense as a marathon distance than 42.2.
The only reason it became 42.2 was so that the end of the 1908 Olympic marathon could end in front of the Queen of England's Royal Nursery. The prior distance was 25 miles (40km). Then England decided the race must start at Windsor castle--adding 1 mile--then the Queen decided it had to be longer to end where she wanted.
That the marathon became locked in to 42.2 because of the dumb reasons above. It is time to erase that nonsense and rest it to 40km, and then the half becomes 20 km.
it did not immediately get locked in the next two Olympics were not 26.2
the marathon wrote:
The Royal Box wrote:
The only reason it became 42.2 was so that the end of the 1908 Olympic marathon could end in front of the Queen of England's Royal Nursery. The prior distance was 25 miles (40km). Then England decided the race must start at Windsor castle--adding 1 mile--then the Queen decided it had to be longer to end where she wanted.
That the marathon became locked in to 42.2 because of the dumb reasons above. It is time to erase that nonsense and rest it to 40km, and then the half becomes 20 km.
it did not immediately get locked in the next two Olympics were not 26.2
But 1908 was where 26.2 was set. It is really dumb to stick with that distance--it is odd, and the basis is poor.
#cleansport wrote:
never forget wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/athletics/3078642.stmIt's hard to watch him run and pretend he is clean
So you think he's been mirodosing all this time? How'd he get away with it all these years?
maybe he's better n you? wrote:
#cleansport wrote:
It's hard to watch him run and pretend he is clean
So you think he's been mirodosing all this time? How'd he get away with it all these years?
#cleansport knows exactly how it is done. He has proven it himself. Lagat has allowed himself to be tested THOUSANDS of times over the last 20 YEARS. That is unlike #cleansport who won't allow a tester anywhere near them.
#notsoclean wrote:
maybe he's better n you? wrote:
So you think he's been mirodosing all this time? How'd he get away with it all these years?
#cleansport knows exactly how it is done. He has proven it himself. Lagat has allowed himself to be tested THOUSANDS of times over the last 20 YEARS. That is unlike #cleansport who won't allow a tester anywhere near them.
Do you really think the testing makes you clean? What planet do you live on? Some good people walked away from organizations (USATF, IAAF) because of this problem. It's just sad the fans will never know the truth as they might think being tested proves no PED's. I only hope more people are honest about what they know and what they have seen.
#cleansport wrote:
Do you really think the testing makes you clean?
Is this your rationale for never wanting yourself tested?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLAJF8r3DIQ#cleansport wrote:
so cries wrote:
It is hard to see you post and pretend you were clean. ... Those who cry the most about others cheating, and the most likely cheaters; they refuse to let themselves ever be tested; better to give a world age best than be found out a cheater.
It's common knowledge he cheated. No shock value in that. Elites know it and talked openly about it.
David Torrence thought that Lagat cheated.
#cleansport is correct wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLAJF8r3DIQ#cleansport wrote:
It's common knowledge he cheated. No shock value in that. Elites know it and talked openly about it.
David Torrence thought that Lagat cheated.
Much to the embarrassment of his pals in the video. Did Torrence do the testing, or intentionally taint one sample while failing to taint the second one identically? Now, you seem to claim that anyone who thinks someone cheated is always correct? Sure thing.
wejo wrote:
Take for a minute and realize how amazing it is that Bernard Lagat is running the World Half Marathon champs this weekend for the USA.
He got a bronze medal at the 2000 Olympics, 18 years ago. He was 25 then. Now he's 43.
The US is pretty damn good at the half-marathon and he's on the team at 43.
He ran 62:00 at Houston this year and the 40+ world record is 61:01 by Haile Gebrselassie. Lagat would have run faster in Houston than his 62:00 if he hadn't gone out so hard. He went out with leaders (60:00 was the winner).
With some better pacing he could challenge the master's WR this weekend.
Here was Lagat talking about wanting to run the World Half for the US when he was the old guy starting the Millrose Games Wanamaker mile this year:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJoZv06sJ9w
I am sorry but it looks like you are wrong again.
Try again wejo:
...Now 40 years old, Gebrselassie won the Great Scottish Run half-marathon in Glasgow over the weekend. His time of 1:01:09 was also good for a course record and bested second place finisher Emmanuel Bett of Kenya. The Ethiopian running legend broke away from Bett with one mile to go and put an impressive 31 seconds on the Kenyan in the final stages of the race.
https://runningmagazine.ca/12388/the430miler wrote:
Wejo,
I think Bernard could set the 15k or 20k road record. Those arent raced very often but are official usatf distance for guiness wr and the alltimeathletics wr website, which is what i use for all my references. Perhaps he could do it at the Tulsa run.
I wish
I don't know whether Lagat was doping but your account of events seems to suggest that an enzyme was taken to degrade/modify EPO in the test.
Geb would have easily broken 60 in early 40s but mistakenly insisted on running marathons. In those, he did well through about the half but then would fade.
Lagat lied about his citizenship status in 2004 so he could compete in Athens. It's troubling hearing him talk about being proud to make national teams and represent the US when it's clear his naturalization was an opportunistic move. He's a weasel with a shlt-eating grin.
* it's also absurd that I was unable to submit my original post because it contained profanity. This is the same message board that allows all the racism and misogyny you can eat, but you can't say "shlt".
I am not interested in defending Lagat, but why should I believe whatever David Torrence said about Lagat? The great minds here at LR have taught me to presume that Torrence was a cheat too.
The only people who think that the botched positive A sample proved Lagat was a doper struggled to get a C in high school biology and believe that "metabolic" is an Italian word for somebody who eats too many meatballs.
i expect that bernie will try very hard to break the record. weather is fine. he is the man to make it happen.
correction: it is too windy for outstanding results.
im always back and forth on drugs in sports. i guess im a black or white on issue. either let them all cheat or no one cheat. not a big fan of covering up the slip ups of the stars. I still like Lance Armstrong, so I can't really hate anyone else that is suspect.