Zimmerman wants $200k from Florida to cover court costs.

GZ shot Thugvon justifiably and was maliciously persecuted by a corrupt Angela Corey and the race baiters. GZ and his great defense team deserve to be reimbursed.

chewbacca wrote:

White people say the funniest things!

I'm not white.

Well. That's kind of my point.

Dennis Reynolds wrote:

ryan foreman wrote:

He sort of has an argument to make. The irony is that if he was going to make common cause with other people in Florida to lobby for him, it would probably be black people who could most relate to his predicament.

Other than OJ what other black man has had a high profile criminal defense team? Public defenders all the way bro.

The taxpayer is now paying the legal costs of psychos who hunt and murder black boys?

Klondike5 wrote:

The taxpayer is now paying the legal costs of psychos who hunt and murder black boys?

Not at all.

Hello wrote:

Klondike5 wrote:

The taxpayer is now paying the legal costs of psychos who hunt and murder black boys?

Not at all.

I hope not. The drug riddled, lying, psycho is hoping so

So, you're not talking about Zimmerman. Who are you talking about?

Hello wrote:

So, you're not talking about Zimmerman. Who are you talking about?

You are unaware that Zimmerman has been on powerful mood altering prescriptions?

Or that he stalked an unarmed teen-ager and shot him to death?

Huh?

dkjkjsjioe wrote:

he should consider himself lucky to have escaped w/o a conviction and move on w/o any cash. Stalking and killing an unarmed teenager should've cost him a lot more.

He was armed with sidewalk

Klondike5 wrote:

You are unaware that Zimmerman has been on powerful mood altering prescriptions?

Or that he stalked an unarmed teen-ager and shot him to death?

Huh?

He did not murder him, as you suggested.

Hello wrote:

Klondike5 wrote:

You are unaware that Zimmerman has been on powerful mood altering prescriptions?

Or that he stalked an unarmed teen-ager and shot him to death?

Huh?

He did not murder him, as you suggested.

Of course he did. He followed an unarmed kid doing no wrong solely because he was a young black male and then shot him to death

The jury disagrees with you.

Why wasn't he found guilty then? Oh, just that little thing about not being able to prove anything.

If you know he was guilty why didn't you offer your information to the prosecution?

Too bad you don't know what you are talking about.

fjsx wrote:

Why wasn't he found guilty then? Oh, just that little thing about not being able to prove anything.

If you know he was guilty why didn't you offer your information to the prosecution?

Too bad you don't know what you are talking about.

Right. White folks have never gotten away with murdering black ones in the American South.

personal responsibility wrote:

My man should insure himself if he's going to be playing vigilante security cop. The taxpayers of FL have no obligation to pay for this sort of action.

I bet you have the whole "personal responsibility" take with Trayvon as well. Hmmmm? There was never a case in this. He should have his fees paid because he was wrongfully charged to begin with. This was a politically motivated event with no chance of ever being a conviction as long as mature adults were sitting on the jury.

Klondike5 wrote:

Of course he did. He followed an unarmed kid doing no wrong solely because he was a young black male and then shot him to death

>> actually believing this

Also, texts from Trayvon Martin's phone that weren't allowed in court showed that TM was in the process of illegally purchasing a handgun, so your unarmed qualifier, though true, wouldn't have been true for long.

Klondike5 wrote:

Of course he did. He followed an unarmed kid doing no wrong solely because he was a young black male and then shot him to death

that doesn't mean he murdered him...there were a few steps in between, the two most important being that Martin started a physical confrontation, which escalated to the point of him slamming Zimmermans head into the concrete (and act we can all agree can lead to a reasonable belief of serious injury)

Is Zimmerman a racist and possibly guilty of harassment for his actions leading up to Martins death, yes

Is he guilty of murder, of course not

should he be entitled to legal fees for a reckless prosecution with no hope of succeeding on the basis of fact, yes

Actually we have no idea who started the physical confrontation. The only one who knows what happened is zimmerman and he sure wasn't going to say anything that would send himself to jail. There is evidence that ZM was losing but that says nothing about who started it. All we know for sure is that ZM got himself into a situation where he felt that he had to kill someone. The rest is pretty much reading your prejudices (i.e. dead black thug got what he deservers, innocent black man harassed and then shot) into the the situation.Murder? Nope. Manslaughter? A good case for that that. Given that other cases have gone either way, you would have to be crazy to consider this reckless prosecution.

hmmmmmmmm wrote:

Klondike5 wrote:

Of course he did. He followed an unarmed kid doing no wrong solely because he was a young black male and then shot him to death

that doesn't mean he murdered him...there were a few steps in between, the two most important being that Martin started a physical confrontation, which escalated to the point of him slamming Zimmermans head into the concrete (and act we can all agree can lead to a reasonable belief of serious injury)

Is Zimmerman a racist and possibly guilty of harassment for his actions leading up to Martins death, yes

Is he guilty of murder, of course not

should he be entitled to legal fees for a reckless prosecution with no hope of succeeding on the basis of fact, yes

Hello wrote: The jury disagrees with you.

You have a man-crush on your Zimmerman inflatable doll. Keeps you warm at night.