Engrish wrote:
wccelder wrote:I ran this race last year and really enjoyed the course as it was flat and fast. Besides the last mile and half which was rutted out and pot holed, I would lean towards seeing faster then average times.
Faster THAN. How does 'faster then average' make any kind of sense?
Well, the times for the first few finishers tend to be faster, and then you see runners running some pretty average times. The people behind them would obviously then run below average times.