Armstrong is guilty. Caught by the numbers.
Armstrong is guilty. Caught by the numbers.
observer of coverage wrote:
Finally!!! God damn, I hate it when these BASTARDS try so hard to say they're innocent and clean.
If there's any of you that think Lance is still clean you seriously have to have your head way up your ass.
Really? But how about Solinsky and Ritz? Lets face it, the only defense people have for these two being clean is that they seem like nice guys and have never tested positive. Oh, and they're training harder now, haha. Well, Floyd was a menonite. Lance passed every test. Cycling is much stricter in its testing than track, it's not even close.
Why is it that when any country has a sudden rise of its distance program in both top marks and depth it means drugs but if it's the US its just smarter training?
Oh ok, if it's true then you'll have no problem in showing me a time where Lance tested positive for performance enhancing drugs.
Brojos suck! Get over yourselves just because you got semi decent at running doesnt make you a god you ego maniac.
not proof. the testers can't test for all PEDs. armstrong has been caught by stats. his chart curves are so blatant even the lab mice and lab monkeys are in shock and awe !
This website is garbage
If Lance is proven to have cheated it will make America look bad. Don't cheer for it.
not to mention numerous reports of armstrong having skin lesions and growths common to steroid drug abusers. not to mention his frequent temper tantrums. then shows he is under Prozac, with David Carridine (Kung Fu TV show) style and "surfer-dude" statements.
Does anyone really care? It will be hard to convince me that Lance or anyone else cheated someone out of a victory. Anyone who has been even marginally involved in the sport of cycling knows that everyone, and I mean everyone, takes something illegal. I've ridden with guys who started on PEDs at the age of 16 and thought nothing of it. So, no one in the cycling world will be surprised of this news, nor will anyone feel that it was the reason that Lance, Floyd, George, etc. won races.
If your only proof is that "He improved a lot over a relatively short period of time" that wouldn't stand up in a court of law or even a scored debate.
Again all I'm hearing is a bunch of hearsay and the fact Lance might be a little bit of an asshole or just feeling lot of pressure as one of the most closely look at athletes of all time.
First of all, if Solinsky and Ritz are suddenly breaking world records, winning multiple Olympic and World Medals, then YES, I'll agree with you. It's highly unlikely that they would be clean.
As for the rise in US distance running, if you think that it is super sudden and NOT a result of smarter training, then you'd probably have to say that High School athletes are now doping as well, since we've seen faster and deeper marks that START in highschool and eventually translate to professional runners.
It's a bunch of facts. Landis and dozens of fellow bikers he had sex with have testified. Ph.D Statisticians, Psychologists, and Doctors have testified to his roided out behavior followed by aloof Kim jong Il womanish behavior. Who do you know, personally, who acts like he does ? He's really dangerously wierd.
Landis might want to go into the witness protection program.
I'm of the opinion until we can actually detect everything, just let them dope to the gills. The worst thing is to allow superstars riding off into the sunset without ever having been caught and getting accolades over people who probably doped less and got stupid one time.
Circumstantial evidence has convicted many cheats like Lance Armstrong for capitol offenses. The evidence in his case is sickeningly overwhelming.
First off, all high school distance records are as old as old, except for two. And the top times and depth of high school marks is the same since the seventies.
Sacondly, the argument that Ritz and Solinski are clean because they aren't breaking records is just lame.
The circumstantial evidence is all hearsay by a bunch of people who have little or no credibility. And being weird isn't against the law last time I checked to the other person who posted above.
In an ideal world allowing everybody to dope like Mr. Armstrong and Mr Landis would be fine. But we taxpayers would then have to foot the bill for hospitalizations of millions of 'roided out youngsters. How many procedures to cut out skin growths and polyps would have to be paid for by taxpayers. There would be millions of additional cases of depressions, suicides, and violent incidents on campuses. Allowing people to freely and openly dope like Lance Armstrong would impact our public health system to such a degree that it would kill our fragile economy.
Just admit it. Lance Armstrong is a doper. You'll feel better. Life goes on.