This is laughable! The results say otherwise and it’s not even close. At best Coplen is a mediocre coach that’s had good luck recruiting/inheriting athletes that make him look good. Sure, he’s had a few runners show a lot of progression their freshman year. But if you look at those results a little closer it’s typically someone with limited experience coming into his program with a reasonably high ceiling, so their progression is natural and quick because it was going to happen regardless the coach. His juniors/seniors have always left a lot to be desired with very little progression later in high school. With all the stellar individual names you can attach to Greg Coplen, he still hasn’t produced a team title which is surprising. Or is it? Maybe that’s the difference in a really good coach like Dalby and a mediocre coach like Coplen. 100 times the coach is a bit of stretch.