I can't understand all the criticism of Kerr's performance when you look at all the facts together and consider what the goal was here. He ran a pretty amazing race today, especially when you remember that longer events like the 2-mile are not his specialty.
Would I take Jakob over Kerr in the 3k or 2 mile? Any day of the week. But in the 1500m, I'd be a bit more concerned if my competition just ran quite fast in their over-distance event when their greatest weakness is their ability to stick with the pace. Kerr's in great shape, and the biggest takeaway is that he's working on his weaknesses and setting himself up for the best possible chance to beat Jakob again.