It is - do you know much about 400m pacing? You have a relatively small optimal window. Anything faster means you falter in the second half, which can be quite dramatic (Klaver herself has done this many times by being too exuberant in the opening 200m. Budapest was the latest example, she hit the 200m mark .3 faster than her SF and died in the straight.) Equally, anything slower means you cannot make up the ground in the second half, because you still don't finish any quicker. (Klaver's final 50m splits in various races show she finishes no quicker if she goes out too slow. )You have to find that sweet pot.
This winter, Klaver's sweet spot looks to be somewhere between 23.7 and 23.9 IMO. We haven't seen her go out faster than 23.9 yet though. So who knows, maybe 23.7 is even too fast, but my instinct is she can manage that. 23.8 could be her ultimate pace.
The point about her doing 23.6, is that it might be needed to beat Bol to the break as you say. My point is, if she does it at the NCs, it doesn't matter if she falters in the 2nd half, she is still much better than the next best Dutchie. So she would finish second anyway. So my view is, just go for it! Don't hand your competitor an easy win, make it tough for them, and who knows, it might throw Bol off. Of course, Bol looks amazingly strong, so it may not make any difference, but nothing ventured....and, if she does it at the NCs, she will know whether it works or not before the World Indoors, where she has more to lose if it doesn't work.
Swiety-Ersetic has employed a similar tactic against Bol in a couple of 4x4's, doing enough to keep her at bay and make her run the turn wide. Stephanie Ann McPherson also did this in the last World Indoor 400m SFinals. Klaver has the opportunity to disrupt Bol's race. If she were not her countrywoman, I believe she would attempt it. Alas, as it is, and she is also her friend, I don't think she will.