81611 wrote:
For people who needed SWA's network and access to secondary markets: they were (maybe still are) a better option compared to the other carriers. But for those of us who don't live near a SWA airport, they're an afterthought. Sure the day-to-day customer service with United might be worse, but I'd rather deal with a professional, straight-forward and more reliable outfit than the cattle-call, junk show of Rapid Rewards-devotee hoi polloi cramming the cattle call lineup to fly SWA.
I'm buying tickets regularly and I can say I've probably checked SWA prices twice in the last 5 years, and I fly from CO to LAX and SEA often. They've never been enough cheaper than United to deal with. My local airport is predominantly operated by United with decent connections to DEN, ORD and DFW. I'd prefer to fly Alaska, but that's also not very viable.
boston to arizona - delta, american, jet blue, and alaska are all cheaper
I dont really care about free bags as I can fit a weeks worth of clothes or more in a carry on. I used to live in the southwest and it was the same story. 4 or 5 airlines were cheaper even to southwest's supposed hubs