VIT wrote:
i take the post as venting about coaching quality in HS which, fair point, it's goofy the team over there gets some brilliant guy and you get a behind times time-server, and then your kid has to show up like it's an even playing field, and it may impact their progression. my suggestion, outside coaching. i learned jack in HS soccer, which to me felt easy, but what made me a player people wanted was my select learning and training.
that being said, personally unless there is misconduct or someone in authority asks your opinion, i would stow it. but if the principal or AD asks what do you think of the team, i would raise the issues and you may not get a personnel change but you might get pressure to modernize/improve on the side issues.
Outside coaching works if the hs coach is humble enough to accept an athlete has another coach and schedule training accordingly. It doesn't work if an athlete is still expected to perform the hs workouts and the outside coach has to plan ways for the athlete to sandbag workouts to be fresh enough for the real training.
OP's complaint was about technology use and expectations for seriousness, not quality of coaching. I think its fine for a coach to expect intrinsic motivation for athletes, though that doesn't work in hs unless the program is already strong.