CDC issues 'chestfeeding' guidelines for biological males 'lactating'

"In sections of the major health institute’s guidance on breastfeeding, it contained information for those who have had much of their breasts removed in gender-reassignment surgeries, or for biological men taking hormones to grow breasts, on how to feed their newborn children.
However, several doctors criticized the guidance, not simply because CDC has appeared to guide biological men in how to breastfeed children, but because they claimed the CDC has failed to gauge the risks posed to children drinking milk produced by chemicals used in gender-reassignment medical operations."

cdc.gov

Breast Surgery

CDC

Learn more about breast surgeries and breastfeeding or chestfeeding.

Link:www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/breastfeedin...

I don't see how this applies to biological males. I think people just want something to be mad about (and get angry clicks)

But EVEN IF IT WAS about biological males, if it's a reality that there are people who want to do that, whatever you think of it, and doctors who want to support them, whatever you think of that, why should health authorities pretend that's not happening and refuse to provide guidance?

Do you not think that it'll be unhealthy to consume milk that's filled with unnatural chemicals to make a biological male 'lactate'?

Would you consume someone's pus?

I have no idea, that's why doctors should study it and provide guidance, not pretend that this isn't something people are trying to do

You prefer they did this without guidelines?

Show the academic evidence that it is unsafe. Unlike you, doctors should act purely on the academic evidence, not conjecture and emotion.

Medical professionals (and the CDC) should follow the facts established in reputable scientific studies, not whether or not they 'feel' something is icky or 'BS'.

Trans women do in fact get breast development on HRT. Anecdotally they seem to be able to actually lactate, not whatever you're talking about.

But then no one who talks about "autogynephiles" has anything worth reading to say on this topic.

"Chestfeeding", while a dumb word, is used, not for trans women as you seem to think, but for trans men and transmasculine non-binary people -- you know, people who would rather not have breasts. I would have thought that would have been obvious, but anti-trans types have a lot of confused ideas.

You are intentionally obfuscating the issue. Transgender‘s will always be outnumbered by normal people. That has nothing to do with whether this is of concern. How we view gender and sexuality matters more than just about anything.

I consume cow's pus.

At this point, I wouldn't trust the CDC to recommend a brand of aspirin.

Breast feeding of babies by biological males and instructions how to do it, brought to you by the Democrat party and Biden's CDC.

Sounds like an illegal film rather than a gmnt brochure.

Imagine taking hormones to induce gynecomastia and produce some man pus that you'll have an innocent baby suck out of you, if they're lucky enough to find a nipple among your chest hair.

This is completely normal btw.

Better start the indoctrination early to reduce the chance of being murdered by your own children when they learn what you did.

Are you suggesting autogynephilia doesn't exist? Not only is this extremely well established science, but there are countless trans women who would tell you they are turned on by the idea of being a woman; in fact they are quite explicit in saying so.

Feeding a child your demonic man-sludge out of your chemically-induced chesticles is just what you gotta do in order to delude yourself into thinking you're a woman.

That's exactly what I'm stating. "Autogynephilia" is just a pseudoscientific gloss put on old stereotypes by J. Michael Bailey, who is much more a sensationalist than a scientist. The real clincher of his arrogance is that he claims that all trans women are either that or super-effeminate gay men who transition to have sex with straight men, and that anyone who claims not to fit either of these categories is lying about themselves. (He generally tries not to acknowledge the existence of trans men.) His hypotheses just do not square with the reality of trans people's experiences.

Obviously there are bizarre exhibitionists out there, but I've known probably a couple dozen trans people well enough to spend significant time with them in person one-on-one or in small groups of friends, and I'm not sure even one of them really fits either of Bailey's two stereotyped categories.