Ok. As long as there are enough of those jobs to go around, and as long as they pay a living wage, I guess we'll be fine.
That's the question, isn't it? Fortunately (or, depending on how you look at it, unfortunately) as society gets more complex and more education and resources are required to achieve stability, most individuals choose to delay having children well into their fertile period, thus shrinking their reproductive window and lowering the overall birth rate. In many parts of the world, the birth rate has already dipped beneath replacement rate. As the population shrinks and ages, labor will become scarce and its value will go up. A similar phenomenon occurred in Europe after the Black Death and again after WWII. The future is not a jobless - it will most like be laborless. That's why labor automation is such a big deal.
Do you mean what we are currently calling AI, or real AI from some time in the future? Can you provide some examples?
It's assumed technology will take away low-paid, low-skilled jobs. I don't want to rule that out but I think a ton of middle-class professional jobs will also be automated too.
A lot of banking and accounting can be automated especially in the cashless society we are headed to, computers can identify routine medical conditions, vehicles can diagnose problems with themselves, chatbots can be sophisticated enough to respond to emails. They're not just sweeping the floor.
IMO the jobs of the future will be things computers have difficulty replicating. I suspect the girl who dropped school to work as a beautician or hairdresser are safe from automation because people (women) see them to have a social interaction as much as anything. I can't imagine robots being able do a comedy routine. Fashion and art is not something computers can do, it's uniquely human. If I was ill I wouldn't want to be nursed by a robot but I don't care if my bank manager is one.
The world will still need high thinkers but those people will need an understanding of society and have human skills, not high IQ people who can do numbers.
Sure, there will be plenty of living wage jobs available for people with an IQ high enough to tinker around with artificial intelligence. But those living wage jobs won't be for the masses of people with just low or average intelligence.
Universal Basic Income needs to get figured out and setup now instead of doing it last minute in a panic.
LOL. This country will never see UBI. Not too long ago we were ending careers for talking like that OP. I don’t dare mutter the words ‘socialism’ where I come from.
Maybe YOU need a job to give your life purpose, but there are many people who would have a wonderful meaningful life without having a job to define their life's purpose.
Reminds me of defending slavery, because without a job those people would have no purpose in their life, right?
Lmao dude UBI is the polar opposite of slavery.
Instead of doing work for no money, you are advocating doing 0 work money.
No ones advocating for being a slave. Nor should anyone advocate for being a paid lazy ass
I am an advocate for Universal Basic Income but not for your stated concern. I do not fear technological development. I am an advocate for U.B.I. because I believe in a social safety net. Means Testing is highly inefficient. Means Testing is a disincentive for improvement program. I find it extremely wasteful to pay thousands of city, county, state and federal government workers $60,000 to $180,000 per year in an attempt to track who had a 5% increase in income over rate of inflation and who had a $5000 increase in net worth.
I vote for capitalism instead. I do not believe a high IQ is the determining fact of high income. I do not care who you are or where you come from, if you have these 3 things you will be very successful in America.
I vote for capitalism instead. I do not believe a high IQ is the determining fact of high income. I do not care who you are or where you come from, if you have these 3 things you will be very successful in America.
1. An endless work ethic
2. A skill people are willing to pay you for
3. Communication skills
People with a low IQ have difficulty developing a skill that people are willing to pay a living wage for.
People with a low IQ have difficulty with communication skills. They are stupid. Their brains are, by definition, ill equipped for excelling in such things.
It's ironic that the same people asking for UBI now because of automation/AI and the subsequent potential loss of jobs are the same people who are comfortable with and continue to allow the illegal immigration of low-skill labor jobs from third world countries.
I know Democrats like this - they just want everything to go their way because they don't live with the consequences of their ideas and grew up with parents that never told them "no".
If you're here illegally, you should be deported. You're taking jobs that some Americans want and need!
It's ironic that the same people asking for UBI now because of automation/AI and the subsequent potential loss of jobs are the same people who are comfortable with and continue to allow the illegal immigration of low-skill labor jobs from third world countries.
Nope. Not me. Sorry that I don't fit the narrative.
UBI is a terrible concept - at minimum for the fact that people need jobs and purpose, for reasons completely aside from compensation.
UBI would incentivise people to be even lazier than they currently are.
Nevermind the fact that paying people for *nothing* is an absolutely terrible idea. Once the cat is out of the bag, theres no putting it back in. We could never undo it.
The only reason people depend on a job for 'reason and purpose' is because they've been trained to think that way.
That's the problem that should be solved, not forcing people to have a job for no reason.
We could start by actually valuing things like the arts in education.
It's so funny that the exact posters who say things like "the only degree worth anything is a STEM degree, everything else is a fluff degree" are the same one's that post things like "people need jobs to give life purpose and meaning"
AI could eliminate low-wage jobs in several ways. One way is through automation. AI-powered machines and robots can perform many manual labor jobs faster, more accurately, and more efficiently than humans, which can make human labor redundant. For example, self-driving vehicles, automated factories, and intelligent assistants can all replace human workers.
Another way is through the use of AI algorithms that can perform cognitive tasks, such as customer service or data entry. These algorithms can analyze large amounts of data, learn from it, and provide accurate responses or recommendations. As these algorithms become more sophisticated, they can replace human workers who perform similar tasks.
The elimination of low-wage jobs can have a significant impact on people's livelihoods, especially those who rely on such jobs to make ends meet. If large numbers of people lose their jobs, it could lead to widespread economic insecurity, poverty, and social unrest.
One potential solution to address the impact of job loss caused by AI is to implement a universal basic income (UBI). UBI is a program where all citizens receive a set amount of money from the government to cover their basic needs. The goal of UBI is to provide people with a safety net, so they can meet their basic needs and maintain a decent standard of living, even if they are not employed.
AI could provide the necessary resources to fund UBI programs by reducing costs and increasing productivity. Automated systems could reduce overhead and manufacturing costs, which could increase profits and tax revenue. As a result, governments could use these savings to fund UBI programs, which could help reduce poverty, increase economic security, and provide a safety net for those affected by the loss of low-wage jobs.
In summary, AI could eliminate low-wage jobs through automation and the use of AI algorithms, which could lead to economic insecurity for those affected. UBI could provide a solution to this problem by ensuring that all citizens receive a basic income to meet their basic needs, regardless of whether they are employed or not. The funding for UBI could come from the increased productivity and reduced costs of AI-powered systems.
well...probably should get john Connor involved, he'll know what to do