1. No, everyone does have intrinsic value. What is inherent to women's value that is absent or so distinct from men? Seems there should be parity.
2. What is "anti-feminist" behavior?
3. So.. it's just about hook-ups? After the first sentence I legitimately cannot follow what you're saying. I didn't go to law school. FWIW no one I know would ever talk about a "body count." It's.. vulgar.
4a. You're mischaracterizing what I've said. There most certainly exists a negative-sum game if women of X (+/- a small range) value refuse to pair with men similar of X
(+/- a small range) value. Women are, after all, the discriminating sex.
4b. Never have I suggested that women doing better economically or socially is a bad thing. I simply don't believe that. There are huge benefits in fact, if she's into you.
5(a). There are orders of magnitude fewer women who create pornography than men who consume it... It creates a sizeable disjunct between reality and expectation. Something I've suggested above. It also squanders energy better placed in physical reality-- for the incel, I mean. There is also a de-sensitizing effect, which does not benefit the incel.
5(b). I have definitely benefitted from women endeavoring into interest in viewing pornography. People should do what they want. But they should understand there are trade-offs.