Military personnel must be underpaid since their lives are so easily expendable. If soldiers were paid better and had better benefits we would be more cautious about getting into military conflicts. But the military is a big business and makes many people far from the battlefield very rich.
They're not underpaid if you reach a point where you qualify for a pension of some sort. If you do your 20 years and get that pension or just get in a condition where you have medical retirement benefits for life, you're on pretty good ground.
The only service members who might be underpaid if you look at it holistically are those who don't do their full 20 years. If you get a pension, the value of the pension is worth over 1 million dollars over the lifetime of a retired soldier.
Enter at 18, retire at 38. Do the math and say you have 40 more years on average to live. Pension is adjusted for inflation as well. You're looking at around $1 million for the average E-7 minimum. Higher for officers and higher enlisted. Move to a state with no state income tax and you could theoretically live off the pension for the rest of your life. But this ideal case is only for those who are single/no kids.
Since 2018 Service Members have a Blended Retirement System. Reduced pension and 401k. So those who choose not to do 20 have something when they leave the military. If they do 20 then it is 40% of base pay not 50%. Then they also have the usual 401k similar to what most US workers pay into.
I think they're paid fairly and just right considering how many benefits they get including free housing and uniforms, and medical. I did some service for the navy and my only complaint is there's wayyyyyy too many sailors for how little work there is. I still bel2theu could cut the entire force in half, raise the standards, and pay higher wages.
If you retire from the military at 52 you're not going to want to work a government job until 72....You won't have the same energy and will be more easily broken down by the little things. You're looking at it from the perspective of your current health and fitness which is a flawed perspective.
They're not underpaid if you reach a point where you qualify for a pension of some sort. If you do your 20 years and get that pension or just get in a condition where you have medical retirement benefits for life, you're on pretty good ground.
The only service members who might be underpaid if you look at it holistically are those who don't do their full 20 years. If you get a pension, the value of the pension is worth over 1 million dollars over the lifetime of a retired soldier.
Enter at 18, retire at 38. Do the math and say you have 40 more years on average to live. Pension is adjusted for inflation as well. You're looking at around $1 million for the average E-7 minimum. Higher for officers and higher enlisted. Move to a state with no state income tax and you could theoretically live off the pension for the rest of your life. But this ideal case is only for those who are single/no kids.
Since 2018 Service Members have a Blended Retirement System. Reduced pension and 401k. So those who choose not to do 20 have something when they leave the military. If they do 20 then it is 40% of base pay not 50%. Then they also have the usual 401k similar to what most US workers pay into.
Alan
Is that only for those who enlist 2018 or later or is it applied retroactively?
From a quality of life perspective, 20 years is just not worth it for some folks. I know a tall guy, 6'5 or 6'6 who did a little over 20 years in the Navy and retired. He got his pension but also retired with chronic health issues that led to him getting additional medical pension. My guess is that being his height on a ship caused a number of orthopedic issues over time.
Either way he looks a lot older than his age so I guess it's true that military members age at twice the rate of the civilian population. I wouldn't want to trade places with him.
Given that the supply is greater than the demand and we need to turn people away that would demonstrate that overpaid if the correct answer.
Actually the branches are struggling to meet recruiting goals. That's why they're doing all of these weird campaigns like using popular gaming streamers to help promote the military.
Overpaid for sure. Looking at pay scales means nothing. BAH + BAS at Fort Benning amounts to $13,600/year ($9,000 for housing @ $750/month and $4,600 for food @ $386/month). Add that to the scale and it makes a huge difference. Basically no bills, except for the BMW, Mustang GT, Mercedes, or Corvette that the 20-yo E2 owns - yes, the barracks my unit uses has about five BMWs, at least three Mustangs, and one each of the others that I have personally seen. Add to this free health care and a $400,000 life insurance policy and the pay is even better. Very few of the enlisted people can do as well on the outside, especially if they only have a GED and/or criminal or drug histories. And there are PLENTY who fit those categories.
Despite what the TV commercials show you, most people in the military spend at least 95% of their time in an office or motor pool doing simple tasks. They are rarely doing intense "Army training." I say this as someone who spent the early years of my career in the infantry including time in Iraq over a dozen years ago when there was an actual war going on. The person working the take out window at McDonalds during the lunch hour is working a helluva lot harder than 95% of the military, and doing it for probably less than half the pay and no benefits.
The military should devise different pay scales based on MOS. People in infantry, armor, cavalry, etc., deserve to be paid better than some POG who spends 20 years just sitting at a desk. These are usually the ones who never shut up about their "deployment" to Iraq or Afghanistan where they did the same thing - sat at a desk for 12 months. It's amazing how many war stories these guys have despite never leaving the FOB. On the other hand, I was on patrols five or six days per week in some really $hitty areas where you didn't dare hit a pothole or it could be the last thing you ever did. And yet, if we had the same rank and time in service, we both were paid equal down to the penny. Until we factor in "separation pay," which I did not get because I was single. The married guys pocketed I believe an extra $250/month on top of hazardous duty pay, etc.
Bottom line is the military is paid far more than we deserve for the amount of work we do, especially in noncombat roles. The thing is, nobody in Congress, whether Democrat or Republican, would dare advocate for a pay cut for our "heroes" in uniform lest they get destroyed by the public who thinks we put our lives at risk every day. Police officers in America are at much greater risk on a daily basis than our military.
If you retire from the military at 52 you're not going to want to work a government job until 72....You won't have the same energy and will be more easily broken down by the little things. You're looking at it from the perspective of your current health and fitness which is a flawed perspective.
Government jobs are very easy. I work with a number of DA Civilians and would take their job in a heartbeat. Most of these jobs are clerical in nature.
Since 2018 Service Members have a Blended Retirement System. Reduced pension and 401k. So those who choose not to do 20 have something when they leave the military. If they do 20 then it is 40% of base pay not 50%. Then they also have the usual 401k similar to what most US workers pay into.
Alan
Is that only for those who enlist 2018 or later or is it applied retroactively?
In 2018 current service members had to choose between the old system and the new system if they were (I think) 12 years time in service or less. I chose to stay in the old system.
I don’t know American military pay scales. My wife is an O7 in another NATO service. She makes the equivalent of about $153k USD, with nearly 40 years of service under her (tiny) belt. From past discussions with US colleagues, their pension is better than hers.
is she overpaid? She could easily find work for more money out of uniform, so I think not, at least relative to fair market value. Others may disagree and consider that too much, I don’t know. She has been exposed to far more danger than nearly every LRC poster, including myself, by a long shot.
The teacher thread got me thinking....do we underpay or overpay our military? I'll share my pay at a later date.
I'll take a shot at this...
An unmarried private straight out of basic is grossly underpaid. An unmarried Soldier, Airman, or Marine is grossly underpaid in general and forced to live in outdated and under maintained facilities and forced to dine in cafeterias with iffy food choices.
The teacher thread got me thinking....do we underpay or overpay our military? I'll share my pay at a later date.
I'll take a shot at this...
An unmarried private straight out of basic is grossly underpaid. An unmarried Soldier, Airman, or Marine is grossly underpaid in general and forced to live in outdated and under maintained facilities and forced to dine in cafeterias with iffy food choices.
Thoughts?
Alan
You receive higher pay in the army if you marry?
Yes. Or if you have a dependent child.
You receive BAH where you are assigned. So it changes every time you are assigned to a different installation (base). You can then reside either in military housing, which is usually townhomes and sometimes not the greatest, or reside off base on the economy. There are pros/cons to each.
Some Soldiers will buy a house at one installation and rent it out when they PCS (move) to another installation where they rent their actual home.
The teacher thread got me thinking....do we underpay or overpay our military? I'll share my pay at a later date.
I'll take a shot at this...
An unmarried private straight out of basic is grossly underpaid. An unmarried Soldier, Airman, or Marine is grossly underpaid in general and forced to live in outdated and under maintained facilities and forced to dine in cafeterias with iffy food choices.
Thoughts?
Alan
I work with some service members. Depending on where they work, they can make out like bandits on housing allowance.
They get a huge preference for hiring after their service is up too. A vet with no degree will beat out a phd when going for a federal job.
Lastly there is the gi bill. The vets may be a little older than normal college students, but going to college is easy street for them. With the hiring preference, they don't have to worry about what they study too much and they don't have significant financial stress.
The teacher thread got me thinking....do we underpay or overpay our military? I'll share my pay at a later date.
I'll take a shot at this...
An unmarried private straight out of basic is grossly underpaid. An unmarried Soldier, Airman, or Marine is grossly underpaid in general and forced to live in outdated and under maintained facilities and forced to dine in cafeterias with iffy food choices.
Thoughts?
Alan
I work with some service members. Depending on where they work, they can make out like bandits on housing allowance.
They get a huge preference for hiring after their service is up too. A vet with no degree will beat out a phd when going for a federal job.
Lastly there is the gi bill. The vets may be a little older than normal college students, but going to college is easy street for them. With the hiring preference, they don't have to worry about what they study too much and they don't have significant financial stress.
Oh and all the vets get 100% disability. Its a joke, like getting a prescription for a marijuana was in california before it was legalized. They can make an appointment at the va hospital and say whatever they want, without any tests or checking and bam - now they're a disabled vet. If they go into federal service, this makes them all but unfireable no matter how bad they are at the job and how little effort they put in.
If you retire from the military at 52 you're not going to want to work a government job until 72....You won't have the same energy and will be more easily broken down by the little things. You're looking at it from the perspective of your current health and fitness which is a flawed perspective.
Depends. Some federal jobs are cake. Some positions in the military can be too. Most military personnel go through a sucky period - some come out into an ok period and others jump straight to easy street for the last few years of service. Repeat if they reenlist.