The alarming thing about the new ministry of truth is that it appears to have a complete partisan focus. Will they be fact checking Biden? The commander in chief spouts disinformation almost every time he tries to utter a complete sentence. This is essentially a government fact checker, and almost every fact checker out there (whether it be from CNN or Fox News) has been wrong.
Foreign interference takes place on both sides of the aisle. Hunter took in plenty of money from foreign entities for the "Big Guy". Hunter was honey trapped by the Russians. Foreign entities likely hacked the Clinton and DNC servers. The left wasn't up in arms when Snowden got asylum in Russia (and is likely assisting the Russians in their war effort, whether he wants to or not) and when Assange was leaking Iraq and Afghanistan war videos (but they were when they leaked Clinton e-mails). Individuals need to be intelligent enough to understand where the information is coming from and not rely on a partisan government entity to provide clarity, because of the perceived bias behind the entity. The entire concept of a ministry of truth likely violates the first amendment of the constitution.
The alarming thing about the new ministry of truth is that it appears to have a complete partisan focus. Will they be fact checking Biden? The commander in chief spouts disinformation almost every time he tries to utter a complete sentence. This is essentially a government fact checker, and almost every fact checker out there (whether it be from CNN or Fox News) has been wrong.
Foreign interference takes place on both sides of the aisle. Hunter took in plenty of money from foreign entities for the "Big Guy". Hunter was honey trapped by the Russians. Foreign entities likely hacked the Clinton and DNC servers. The left wasn't up in arms when Snowden got asylum in Russia (and is likely assisting the Russians in their war effort, whether he wants to or not) and when Assange was leaking Iraq and Afghanistan war videos (but they were when they leaked Clinton e-mails). Individuals need to be intelligent enough to understand where the information is coming from and not rely on a partisan government entity to provide clarity, because of the perceived bias behind the entity. The entire concept of a ministry of truth likely violates the first amendment of the constitution.
They will go after anyone who does not go along with the Oligarchs agenda. Period.
More than ever, we need a Centrist Party. A lot of people swing from supporting one side to the other based on the perceived greatest evil rather than on vision or merit.
Amazing how these people cling to the establishment narrative despite the fact it is not only exposed as nothing but lies time and time again but is usually ridiculous in any event.
Not only cling to the Lie but are triggered to attack anyone who exposes the dishonesty.
What makes you think I "cling to the establishment narrative?" Just because I disagree with you and call you out for spewing fallacious and reactionary arguments it doesn't mean I'm sort of establishment shill. For what it's worth I think there are small kernels of truth in most of what you have to say, you just take these kernels and run with them to such extremes that you lose trace of validity or soundness in your arguments that you may have had otherwise.
You've shown time and time again that you're unable to pick up on nuance or understand the complexity involved in the issues you're so hellbent on proselytizing on a running forum; reality doesn't exist in the extreme black and white tones in which you're so keen on painting it. Tbh I don't even know why I trying to have a discussion with you here, you're too recalcitrant and vacuous to engage with in any meaningful way.
Amazing how these people cling to the establishment narrative despite the fact it is not only exposed as nothing but lies time and time again but is usually ridiculous in any event.
Not only cling to the Lie but are triggered to attack anyone who exposes the dishonesty.
What makes you think I "cling to the establishment narrative?" Just because I disagree with you and call you out for spewing fallacious and reactionary arguments it doesn't mean I'm sort of establishment shill. For what it's worth I think there are small kernels of truth in most of what you have to say, you just take these kernels and run with them to such extremes that you lose trace of validity or soundness in your arguments that you may have had otherwise.
You've shown time and time again that you're unable to pick up on nuance or understand the complexity involved in the issues you're so hellbent on proselytizing on a running forum; reality doesn't exist in the extreme black and white tones in which you're so keen on painting it. Tbh I don't even know why I trying to have a discussion with you here, you're too recalcitrant and vacuous to engage with in any meaningful way.
What makes him think that? He's an idiot.
How more ridiculous, paranoid nutbag posts by him do you need to see to conclude that?
Amazing how these people cling to the establishment narrative despite the fact it is not only exposed as nothing but lies time and time again but is usually ridiculous in any event.
Not only cling to the Lie but are triggered to attack anyone who exposes the dishonesty.
What makes you think I "cling to the establishment narrative?" Just because I disagree with you and call you out for spewing fallacious and reactionary arguments it doesn't mean I'm sort of establishment shill. For what it's worth I think there are small kernels of truth in most of what you have to say, you just take these kernels and run with them to such extremes that you lose trace of validity or soundness in your arguments that you may have had otherwise.
You've shown time and time again that you're unable to pick up on nuance or understand the complexity involved in the issues you're so hellbent on proselytizing on a running forum; reality doesn't exist in the extreme black and white tones in which you're so keen on painting it. Tbh I don't even know why I trying to have a discussion with you here, you're too recalcitrant and vacuous to engage with in any meaningful way.
Amazing how these people cling to the establishment narrative despite the fact it is not only exposed as nothing but lies time and time again but is usually ridiculous in any event.
Not only cling to the Lie but are triggered to attack anyone who exposes the dishonesty.
What makes you think I "cling to the establishment narrative?" Just because I disagree with you and call you out for spewing fallacious and reactionary arguments it doesn't mean I'm sort of establishment shill. For what it's worth I think there are small kernels of truth in most of what you have to say, you just take these kernels and run with them to such extremes that you lose trace of validity or soundness in your arguments that you may have had otherwise.
You've shown time and time again that you're unable to pick up on nuance or understand the complexity involved in the issues you're so hellbent on proselytizing on a running forum; reality doesn't exist in the extreme black and white tones in which you're so keen on painting it. Tbh I don't even know why I trying to have a discussion with you here, you're too recalcitrant and vacuous to engage with in any meaningful way.
What makes you think I "cling to the establishment narrative?" Just because I disagree with you and call you out for spewing fallacious and reactionary arguments it doesn't mean I'm sort of establishment shill. For what it's worth I think there are small kernels of truth in most of what you have to say, you just take these kernels and run with them to such extremes that you lose trace of validity or soundness in your arguments that you may have had otherwise.
You've shown time and time again that you're unable to pick up on nuance or understand the complexity involved in the issues you're so hellbent on proselytizing on a running forum; reality doesn't exist in the extreme black and white tones in which you're so keen on painting it. Tbh I don't even know why I trying to have a discussion with you here, you're too recalcitrant and vacuous to engage with in any meaningful way.
See what I mean?
I posted an article on the admin creating a "Ministry of Truth" and these guys, instead of being concerned about this frightening move, get mad at me.
And adopt an intellectual pose to do so ("you're unable to pick up on nuance or understand the complexity involved in the issues you're so hellbent on proselytizing").
I posted an article on the admin creating a "Ministry of Truth" and these guys, instead of being concerned about this frightening move, get mad at me.
And adopt an intellectual pose to do so ("you're unable to pick up on nuance or understand the complexity involved in the issues you're so hellbent on proselytizing").
Please.
Let's stick to facts and plain English.
Carmione can you list your current top 5 GQP boogey men? Its often hard to keep track.
I posted an article on the admin creating a "Ministry of Truth" and these guys, instead of being concerned about this frightening move, get mad at me.
And adopt an intellectual pose to do so ("you're unable to pick up on nuance or understand the complexity involved in the issues you're so hellbent on proselytizing").
Please.
Let's stick to facts and plain English.
Facts 😂😂😂😂
Coming from the guy proven to have lied 6 times on one day this week this is hilarious.
I posted an article on the admin creating a "Ministry of Truth" and these guys, instead of being concerned about this frightening move, get mad at me.
And adopt an intellectual pose to do so ("you're unable to pick up on nuance or understand the complexity involved in the issues you're so hellbent on proselytizing").
Please.
Let's stick to facts and plain English.
Carmione can you list your current top 5 GQP boogey men? Its often hard to keep track.
Thanks!
Can you tell me why the creation of a Ministry of Truth does not bother you, but my posting about it does?