Still can't be believe that she got away with that. Because of an Uber receipt! "proving" that she was home, provided months after her provisional suspension.
If you think it's drug aided, please provide some rationale like, "Her improvement is suspicious.... x percent % of top sprinters have tested positive..... Her coach served a ban (I'm just providing these as examples, not actually referring to her)"
The whereabouts absences were highly suspicious along with the huge breakthrough season along with the pandemic and sprinters all over the world magically peeling tenths of a second of their life time personal bests despite being well past their primes. If she was doing something she did a great job of getting away with it because 99 percent of people never batted an eye and she got to compete at Tokyo, whereas shacarri was popped for cannabis.
If you think it's drug aided, please provide some rationale like, "Her improvement is suspicious.... x percent % of top sprinters have tested positive..... Her coach served a ban (I'm just providing these as examples, not actually referring to her)"
Random accusations like yours don't help.
Rojo are you high?
Is this the same Gabby Thomas that missed 3 drug tests?
Excuse me, but that's a HUGE red flag.
I honestly can't tell if you are trolling your own board with that post. It would be like someone implying Flojo was drug aided and you responding with "please provide rationale, random accusations dont help."
Everybody misses at least one.
There are a number of bad actors in our sport. She’s not one of them.
Abby Steiner is not yet at the level of Gabby Thomas and certainly not ETH. She could potentially be at the level of those two some day but let's give her some time to develop. I think that she's still only 21 years old (she might be 22). There is no sense in putting undue pressure on her to produce the times of those two.
That said, Steiner could potentally beat SAFP (at the 200, definitley not the 100), Mboma, Shericka, Sc'R, Prandini, and some others. I'm anxious to see what Steiner does this upcoming outdoor season and when she races against those others this upcoming summer as a professional. Let's not get ahead of ourselves, though. She's a huge talent and there is a lot of hope for her but we should temper our enthusiasm.
Nfl players are not drug tested all that often The actual frequency is “up to six times per season and at least once per season” Notice that’s “during the season”. So they’re free to take any steroid they want once their season ends. So basically - if you’re a star, you get tested once per season. And guess what? The tests aren’t so random. They get informed well in advance of the test so that they can get anything out of their system.
Abby Steiner is not yet at the level of Gabby Thomas and certainly not ETH. She could potentially be at the level of those two some day but let's give her some time to develop. I think that she's still only 21 years old (she might be 22). There is no sense in putting undue pressure on her to produce the times of those two.
That said, Steiner could potentally beat SAFP (at the 200, definitley not the 100), Mboma, Shericka, Sc'R, Prandini, and some others. I'm anxious to see what Steiner does this upcoming outdoor season and when she races against those others this upcoming summer as a professional. Let's not get ahead of ourselves, though. She's a huge talent and there is a lot of hope for her but we should temper our enthusiasm.
No one beating Mboma at the 200M this year. It will be Mboma against the WR.
Is this the same Gabby Thomas that missed 3 drug tests?
Excuse me, but that's a HUGE red flag.
I honestly can't tell if you are trolling your own board with that post. It would be like someone implying Flojo was drug aided and you responding with "please provide rationale, random accusations dont help."
Everybody misses at least one.
There are a number of bad actors in our sport. She’s not one of them.
Uhh....everyone does not miss THREE TESTS!
like everyoneisdoping1212 said, miss one..potentially a mistake. Miss two, you are now very sketchy. Miss three, you are hiding something and doping.
22.23 is the basic time, no wind, while 21.88, I assume, is the time with the max legal wind of 2 m/s. We used the same guy's calculator.
Mureika's calculator corrects to 0.0 wind. Note the Bolt and Griffith-Joyner examples at the bottom of his page. So according to him Thomas' run today was worth 21.88 basic.
If you use a no wind reading. The time gets adjusted to 21.71. Either way you are wrong.