xczvzxcv wrote:
Davin Thompson, HS Class of 2021. True freshman. 4:17/9:11. Impressive start (21st at Mtn Regional).
Aidan Troutner, HS class of 2018, 2017 Nike Cross champ. Mission Edmonton 2018-20. Under normal circumstances, he'd be a senior this year, so defer any discussion of his eligibility until next year--plus everyone got an extra year of eligibility because of COVID, so hold off until 2023 xc.
Casey Clinger, HS class of 2017, 2015-16 Nike Cross champ. Mission Sapporo, Japan 2019-20 (don't worry, no one runs there!). Ordinarily would have graduated in the spring 2021. Everyone got an extra year, though, so can't complain about him until next year.
Brandon Garnica, HS class of 2018, 20th at Nike Cross in 2017 (4:16/8:57 in hs), ordinarily would be a senior, so you can't complain, plus he's an electrical engineering major.
Lucas Bons, HS class of 2018, 1:53/4:09/9:08, mission in Cote D'Ivoire 2018-20, ordinarily would be a senior, and is a mechanical engineering major, so you can't complain.
Conner Mantz, HS class of 2015! Mission in Ghana. 4:12/8:55. This guy you can complain about even with the added year from COVID. 2018 should've been his last xc season.
Thing is, NCAA officials also have access to this information. They have the authority to DQ any of them and the whole program as well. With enough repeated violations, wouldn't they cease to be an NCAA member? Oh wait, there could never really be repeated rule breaking because officials would enforce every instance of attempted cheating when it happened, wouldn't they?
It seems that what everyone is saying whenever that school comes up is that the NCAA has rules written somewhere but doesn't enforce them. Maybe doesn't really even have officials whose job it is to enforce them. If that is the case, can't everybody have infinite eligibility? If there's nobody whose job it is to see if you've already competed in 4 seasons of a particular sport and nobody's paying attention, all of you could have done 8 seasons each of XC and T&F right? If your claim is that they do it, it's technically against the rules, but they get away with it, why don't you get away with it too? If you were hoping to run NCAA from 18 to 38, and no system is in place to prevent that, why don't you do it? What exactly is your objection?