Cal vs USC football game CANCELLED after Cal covid outbreak

wejo wrote:

I don’t understand Rojo a bunch of the time.

We don’t understand him most of the time.

Why do you let him start threads like this then? you’re KILLING the reputation of your site.

wejo wrote:

I don’t understand Rojo a bunch of the time.

Welcome to the club. Ofa lon teh. Sad.

just asking questions like Rojo does wrote:

wejo wrote:

I don’t understand Rojo a bunch of the time.

We don’t understand him most of the time.

Why do you let him start threads like this then? you’re KILLING the reputation of your site.

Here's the thing; if rojo's twin can't understand whatever comes out of his mouth and keyboard, how is anyone else supposed to? It seems like wejo is suggesting that whatever rojo presents, he really knows that it is incorrect and that he meant to give the correct idea. I for one already dismiss whatever rojo writes or says as being wrong, at least 99% of the time. However, I don't think rojo is correct even in his mind more than 1% of the time.

2600 bro wrote:

If 24 players on a team were sick with the flu (unlikely since flu isn’t nearly as contagious as COVID), I highly doubt Cal would be playing either…

What an inane premise.

You would be wrong:

wejo wrote:

Robert knows the vaccine doesn’t stop the spread . It may dampen it to some extent but the title made it sound like he thinks the vaccine doesn’t do anything when he would say it is effective at preventing severe outcomes .

I didn't know that at all. I knew there were breakthrough infections but didn't know it would be 24 people on a football team.

joed|rtay wrote:

The CDC stopped tracking breakthrough infections in May because they knew it would make the public skeptical of vaccination after the data started coming in from Israel and the UK. In the UK, 87% of cases in the most recent surveillance report for those over 30 are among vaccinated individuals (a demographic where the fully vaccinated rate is about 90%). .

This is the stuff that bothers me. Be honest about the vaccine. I still tink the vaccinei s very good againsgt death which is what I worry about. I don't worry about getting sick.

But hiding stuff makes people distrust the govt. The only things I've ripped Fauci for are consistently underplaying the virus.

He told us a) not to get masks an d b) lied about the percent of vaxxs needed to get her immunity.

I want honesty, period.

just asking questions like Rojo does wrote:

Vaccine denial thread from ROJO!!! Yay!!!

Do you know anyone not vaxxsed? I do. And i constantly badger all three of them to get vaxxed. But they don't trust the people telling us to get vaxxed. And I understand why they don't trust them.

This isn't an anti vax thread at all. It's "everyone except the very young has been vaxxed, we should let people do what they want to do moving forward."

rojo wrote:

just asking questions like Rojo does wrote:

Vaccine denial thread from ROJO!!! Yay!!!

Do you know anyone not vaxxsed? I do. And i constantly badger all three of them to get vaxxed. But they don't trust the people telling us to get vaxxed. And I understand why they don't trust them.

This isn't an anti vax thread at all. It's "everyone except the very young has been vaxxed, we should let people do what they want to do moving forward."

No, it’s you continuing to spread misinformation under the guise that you’re a “free thinker.”

YOU ARE AN ADMINISTRATOR OF A RUNNING WESBITE.

That is ALL you are. Act accordingly

Opened this thread thinking I was going to see a 2020 timestamp on it.

rojo is right. The phony pandemic needs to be considered over by now.

jamin wrote:

Opened this thread thinking I was going to see a 2020 timestamp on it.

rojo is right. The phony pandemic needs to be considered over by now.

I know, right? We are down to 2000 US deaths per day.

How in the hell did you not know that?

If you’re genuinely that ignorant about the issue, why not sit back, read and observe instead of launching in with ignorant ramblings?

I just about give up.,

How about, owners and moderators, just stay neutral on divisive issues?

How about creating the appearance of an open forum where ideas can be discussed and presented, and the people who run the show are behind the scenes (repeat: behind the scenes) to step in if necessary?

They should not be the provocateurs.

If they cannot fathom that they might be provoking divisiveness, all the more reason to just be quiet and moderate,

jamin wrote:

Opened this thread thinking I was going to see a 2020 timestamp on it.

rojo is right. The phony pandemic needs to be considered over by now.

It is over, for my dead neighbor. Died of Covid a few weeks ago.

You'll probably see a for sale sign on her house soon, and you run by her house several times a week.

But that's okay, jamin, keep spreading your f'g lies.