I was partly joking. The point in there is that we're not very good at creating medalists in the event if we go 20+ years between medalists, historically. So nobody going sub-9 (in a meet starved year) isn't a sign of much of anything.
I was partly joking. The point in there is that we're not very good at creating medalists in the event if we go 20+ years between medalists, historically. So nobody going sub-9 (in a meet starved year) isn't a sign of much of anything.