GUDAF MF TSEGAY

Edit: the 'SPORTFLEX SUPER X 720 K39' is 12.0kg/m^2 (rather than 12.6kg/m^2). These areal weights are for their standard 13.5mm thickness.

16 FRANCE LIEVIN ARENA STADE COUVERT DE LIEVIN SPORTFLEX SUPER X & REKORTAN M Mondo S.p.A., ITA / Polytan GmbH, GER

https://www.worldathletics.org/download/download?filename=0738afea-7332-4dba-abee-0013878bbc33.pdf&urlslug=CERTIFICATES%20-%20Certified%20Athletics%20Facilities

sabadell wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

That's because you don't have access to what her doctors know.

Managed by Pineda, along with Kipruto, Kisorio, Mikhou, Dibaba, Souileman, and Fsiha. Seeing a trend?

Is it me or are the roids thinning her hair?

ukathleticscoach wrote:

sabadell wrote:

Managed by Pineda, along with Kipruto, Kisorio, Mikhou, Dibaba, Souileman, and Fsiha. Seeing a trend?

Is it me or are the roids thinning her hair?

It's you.

A huge 2 seconds under the previous wr and 6 seconds faster than a world class competitor in Muir, who is a 3.55 runner outdoors. Yet another wr falling in the Covid era, when drug testing has been reduced because of the pandemic, and from a runner who comes from a country believed to be weak in doping enforcement. If she's clean I'd hate to think what she could do if she was doped.

Armstronglivs wrote:

If she's clean I'd hate to think what she could do if she was doped.

Because she's not from your country?

o0o0o0 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

If she's clean I'd hate to think what she could do if she was doped.

Because she's not from your country?

Yes, his country has testing.

ukathleticscoach wrote:

o0o0o0 wrote:

Because she's not from your country?

Yes, his country has testing.

And therefore he hates to think what she could do if she was doped but has achieved the great result clean? Maybe you can explain this?

o0o0o0 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

If she's clean I'd hate to think what she could do if she was doped.

Because she's not from your country?

I don't care what country she's from - I detest doping anywhere.

o0o0o0 wrote:

ukathleticscoach wrote:

Yes, his country has testing.

And therefore he hates to think what she could do if she was doped but has achieved the great result clean? Maybe you can explain this?

I dont think she's clean. But if she were - and only for the sake of argument - then she would be far faster than the Chinese or Dibaba if she doped, because she's already far better than them indoors.

o0o0o0 wrote:

ukathleticscoach wrote:

Yes, his country has testing.

OK, you can't explain your nonsense - as usual.

And therefore he hates to think what she could do if she was doped but has achieved the great result clean? Maybe you can explain this?

o0o0o0 wrote:

ukathleticscoach wrote:

Yes, his country has testing.

And therefore he hates to think what she could do if she was doped but has achieved the great result clean? Maybe you can explain this?

OK, you can't explain your nonsense - as usual.

Armstronglivs wrote:

o0o0o0 wrote:

And therefore he hates to think what she could do if she was doped but has achieved the great result clean? Maybe you can explain this?

I dont think she's clean. But if she were - and only for the sake of argument - then she would be far faster than the Chinese or Dibaba if she doped, because she's already far better than them indoors.

And what's your problem with that?

She's a bad person because if she achieved her results clean, then doped she would...

All you people are just insane. And your "reasoning" has to do with the fact that she is not from your country.

I am not buying this performance.

o0o0o0 wrote:

o0o0o0 wrote:

OK, you can't explain your nonsense - as usual.

And therefore he hates to think what she could do if she was doped but has achieved the great result clean? Maybe you can explain this?

I could but it would be unlikely to make sense to someone of your very limited IQ. I said if she was clean. But you still won't get the point.

o0o0o0 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

I dont think she's clean. But if she were - and only for the sake of argument - then she would be far faster than the Chinese or Dibaba if she doped, because she's already far better than them indoors.

And what's your problem with that?

She's a bad person because if she achieved her results clean, then doped she would...

All you people are just insane. And your "reasoning" has to do with the fact that she is not from your country.

English doesn't appear to be your first language if you think my statement is actually suggesting she is clean. And your nationality seems to be showing.

Of course she is clean. Level playing field for all.

Armstronglivs wrote:

I could but it would be unlikely to make sense to someone of your very limited IQ. I said if she was clean. But you still won't get the point.

That's your statement:

"If she's clean I'd hate to think what she could do if she was doped."

I asked you why.

If she's clean, she's an fantastic athlete. What's your problem with that?

I don't have a very limited IQ, why do you think so?

Armstronglivs wrote:

English doesn't appear to be your first language if you think my statement is actually suggesting she is clean.

I never thought you'd think she was clean. And I haven't written anything to suggest otherwise.

Is it something bad for you for not having English as first language?