If the clean women's world record in the marathon ends up being under 2:10, does that make any sense? When Ruth Chepngetich did it, Amby Burfoot said it had to be doping. Across standard distance events, the women's world record is consistently 10% to 11% slower than the men's. A sub-2:10 shrinks that gap to 8.8%. Can male pacers and supershoes explain the discrepancy?
*MB: Can a clean woman actually run 2:09 in the marathon? That's only 8.8% slower than the men's WR LetsR
One messageboard poster describes the above interview as the "best interview I've ever seen." More Budapest interviews here.